2
$\begingroup$

Let $S$ be a finite set of tetrahedrons in $\mathbb{R}^3$. Let $S$ be tetrahedral complex in a sense that if two tetrahedrons intersect, the intersection is a face of both. In what follows we view tetrahedrons and their faces as closed sets in $\mathbb{R}^3$. Let the underlying topological space $|S|$ (domain occupied by all tetrahedrons with the topology inherited from $\mathbb{R}^3$) be manifold with boundary.

Let $T$ be arbitrary subset of tetrahedrons from $S$. Let $\partial T$ consist of those 2-simplices, which are faces of exactly one tetrahedron from $T$. Let $|\partial T|$ be the underlying topological space.

Suppose $|\partial T|$ is homeomorphic to a 2-sphere. Does it follow that $T$ is homeomorphic to a 3d ball? If not, what would be a counter-example?

$\endgroup$
6
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, this is Alexander's theorem. This answer was given as part of an answer to your previous question as well. $\endgroup$ Apr 26, 2012 at 20:18
  • $\begingroup$ I am voting to close as "spam". $\endgroup$
    – Igor Rivin
    Apr 26, 2012 at 20:37
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ In that answer there was additional requirement that $|T|$ is a manifold with boundary. I asked in comments if this requirement could be dropped, and somebody answered "no" without any explanation. $\endgroup$
    – IL.
    Apr 26, 2012 at 20:44
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I would have thought that if a collection of tetrahedra in $\mathbb R^3$ has a manifold boundary, then it is itself a manifold with boundary, since all non-manifold points would have to involve the boundary. $\endgroup$
    – Jim Conant
    Apr 26, 2012 at 21:37
  • $\begingroup$ Jim, yes, that's why I asked if the requirement on $|T|$ could be dropped. $\endgroup$
    – IL.
    Apr 26, 2012 at 21:46

0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.