A solid ring is a ring $R$ such that the multiplication $R\otimes_{\mathbb{Z}} R \to R$ is an isomorphism.
These were classified by Bousfield and Kan; they are

  1. subrings of $\mathbb{Q}$,

  2. $\mathbb{Z}/n$,

  3. products $R\times \mathbb{Z}/n$ with $R\subseteq \mathbb{Q}$ and every divisor of $n$ invertible in $R$

  4. colimits of these.

I wonder how small the list gets if I put the additional constraint that $\mathrm{Tor}_{\mathbb{Z}}(R,R) = 0$.

REFERENCE: Bousfield, A. K.; Kan, D. M. The core of a ring. J. Pure Appl. Algebra 2 (1972), 73–81.

  • $\begingroup$ Did you mean Tor_i = 0 for i > 0? $\endgroup$ Apr 25 '12 at 14:22
  • $\begingroup$ Is R supposed to be $\mathbb{Q}$ on the second line? $\endgroup$ Apr 25 '12 at 14:31
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ It seems R must be {\mathbb Q}. Also, I think you must mean colimits, not limits. $\endgroup$ Apr 25 '12 at 14:44
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Your summary of Bousfield and Kan's results is inaccurate in a number of ways. You should probably start by reviewing their paper. I think it works out that the only solid rings with $\text{Tor}_{\mathbb{Z}}(R,R)=1$ are the localisations $\mathbb{Z}[J^{-1}]$ (for any set of primes $J$). $\endgroup$ Apr 25 '12 at 14:55
  • $\begingroup$ I apologize for the mangling of the classification of solid rings; fixed now, I think. $\endgroup$
    – Jeff Strom
    Apr 26 '12 at 14:06

Let $R^t$ be the torsion submodule and consider the exact sequence

$$0\rightarrow R^t\rightarrow R \rightarrow R/R^t\rightarrow 0$$

Bousfield and Kan show that the ring on the right is a localization of ${\mathbb Z}$, hence flat over ${\mathbb Z}$, so its $Tor$ with $R$ vanishes. Thus if we $Tor$ the above with $R$, we get $Tor(R^t,R)=Tor(R,R)$.

Now tensor the exact sequence with $R^t$ instead of $R$. This gives $Tor(R^t,R^t)=Tor(R^t,R)$.

Thus $Tor(R,R)=Tor(R^t,R^t)$. But if $R^t$ is nonzero then (see Bousfield and Kan) it contains some ${\mathbb Z}/p{\mathbb Z}$ as a direct summand and hence $Tor(R^t,R^t)$ does not vanish. Thus $Tor(R,R)=0$ implies $R^t=0$. It follows (B/K 3.7) that $R$ is a localization of ${\mathbb Z}$.

  • $\begingroup$ This is perfect! $\endgroup$
    – Jeff Strom
    Apr 26 '12 at 14:06

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.