10
$\begingroup$

How do I feasibly generate a random sample from an $n$-dimensional $\ell_p$ ball? Specifically, I'm interested in $p=1$ and large $n$. I'm looking for descriptions analogous to the statement for $p=2$: Take $n$ standard gaussian random variables and normalize.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ There's an obvious map from the $\ell_2$ ball to the $\ell_1$ ball. Does that not work for you? What kind of distribution do you want? $\endgroup$ Dec 17 '09 at 17:27
  • $\begingroup$ I'm interested in the uniform distribution. If by "obvious map" you mean rescaling, then that wouldn't work. $\endgroup$
    – Mitch
    Dec 17 '09 at 17:38
23
$\begingroup$

For arbitrary p, this paper does exactly what you want. Specifically, pick $X_1,\ldots,X_n$ independently with density proportional to $\exp(-|x|^p)$, and $Y$ an independent exponential random variable with mean 1. Then the random vector $$\frac{(X_1,\ldots,X_n)}{(Y+\sum |X_i|^p)^{1/p}}$$ is uniformly distributed in the unit ball of $\ell_p^n$.

The paper also shows how to generate certain other distributions on the $\ell_p^n$ ball by modifying the distribution of $Y$.

$\endgroup$
3
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ This is the natural answer to the problem. It directly generalizes the Gaussian point method for $p=2$. $\endgroup$ Dec 17 '09 at 19:40
  • $\begingroup$ Is there a way to sample exactly from $\exp(-|x|^p)$ for $p>2$? or should I just use slice sampling or other MCMC method? $\endgroup$
    – gwding
    Feb 1 '18 at 20:30
  • $\begingroup$ @gwding: I'm not an expert on random number generation, and I'm really not sure what the done thing is when (as in this case) there's no simple formula for the cdf. $\endgroup$ Feb 1 '18 at 21:38
9
$\begingroup$

I'll assume that you're looking for a uniformly chosen random point in the ball, since you didn't state otherwise. For p=1, you're asking for a uniform random point in the cross polytope in n dimensions. That is the set

$ C_n = \{ x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_n \in \mathbb{R} : |x_1| + \cdots + |x_n| \le 1 \}. $

By symmetry, it suffices to pick a random point $(X_1, \ldots, X_n)$ from the simplex

$ S_n = \{ x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_n \in \mathbb{R}^+ : x_1 + \cdots + x_n \le 1 \}$

and then flip $n$ independent coins to attach signs to the $x_i$.

From Devroye's book Non-uniform random variable generation (freely available on the web at the link above, see p. 207 near the beginning of Chapter 5), we can pick a point in the simplex uniformly at random by the following procedure:

  • let $U_1, \ldots, U_n$ be iid uniform(0,1) random variables
  • let $V_1, \ldots, V_n$ be the $U_i$ reordered so that $V_1 \le V_2 \le \cdots \le V_n$ (the "order statistics"); let $V_0 = 0, V_{n+1} = 1$
  • let $X_i = V_i - V_{i-1}$

So do this to pick the absolute values of the coordinates of your points; attach signs chosen uniformly at random, and you're done.

This of course relies on the special structure of balls in $\ell^1$; I don't know how to generalize it to arbitrary $p$.

$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ C_n and S_N are of course sets; I can't figure out how to get the braces to show up. $\endgroup$ Dec 17 '09 at 17:37
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for the reference. For $p=1$ this was what I thought, but I didn't have a reference. I'm still interested in p>2 though. $\endgroup$
    – Mitch
    Dec 17 '09 at 17:45
  • $\begingroup$ Fixed the braces. If you're curious how I did this, I'll put up a note on tea.mathoverflow.net $\endgroup$ Dec 17 '09 at 17:48
  • $\begingroup$ David, thanks for fixing the notation. Mitch, I'd love an answer for other p as well. It seems like a problem someone should have considered but quick searching isn't finding any answers other than the obvious one of picking a random point in the unit cube and throwing it out if it doesn't work, which for large n gets very bad. $\endgroup$ Dec 17 '09 at 17:50
  • $\begingroup$ With this process the L1 norm of X is always $V_{n+1} - V_0 = 1$ so this simulates a random point on the $l_1$ sphere, not the ball $\endgroup$
    – Gericault
    May 18 '20 at 14:37

This site is temporarily in read only mode and not accepting new answers.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .