14
$\begingroup$

In 'Cours d'arithmetique', Serre mentions in passing the following fact (communicated to him by Bombieri): Let P be the set of primes whose first (most significant) digit in decimal notation is 1. Then P possesses an analytic density, defined as

$\lim_{s \to 1^+} \frac{\sum_{p \in P} p^{-s}}{\log(\frac{1}{s-1})}$.

This is an interesting example since it's easy to see that this set does not have a 'natural' density, defined simply as the limit of the proportion of elements in P to the # of all primes up to $x$, as $x$ tends to infinity. Therefore the notion of analytic density is a genuine extension of the naive notion (they do coincide when both exist).

How would one go about proving that P has an analytic density?

EDIT: This answer has been asked again a few years ago, and it is my fault. I did accept Ben Weiss' answer but I couldn't back then check the papers, and it turns out that they don't actually answer my question! So, please refer to the newer version of the question for additional information.

Improve this question
$\endgroup$
6
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry, I just want to check for clarity, is your question (more simply stated): "prove that limit exists"? $\endgroup$ – Ben Weiss Dec 17 '09 at 1:23
  • $\begingroup$ ``Clearly'' the analytic density here is log_10 2, by Benford's law. $\endgroup$ – Michael Lugo Dec 17 '09 at 2:04
  • $\begingroup$ @Michael: I don't understand why Benford's law "clearly" applies here. I understand the principle of it is at work, but I don't think it is so obvious you can apply it. As Gjergji explains below you first must do some work to show equidistribution. $\endgroup$ – Ben Weiss Dec 17 '09 at 2:08
  • $\begingroup$ Ben: the quotes around the first word of my previous comment were meant to indicate sarcasm. $\endgroup$ – Michael Lugo Dec 17 '09 at 2:11
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ my mistake...I failed the class in sarcasm. It's why they kicked me out of NYC and I'm now in the midwest. $\endgroup$ – Ben Weiss Dec 17 '09 at 2:14
12
$\begingroup$

I think instead of posting my own explanation (which will only lose something in the translation) I'll instead refer you to two very interesting papers (thanks for posting this question, I haven't thought about this stuff in a couple years, and these papers were interesting reads to solve your problem.)

The first (among other things) proves that the density of primes with leading coefficient $k$ is $\log_{10}\left(\frac{k +1}{k}\right).$

Prime numbers and the first digit phenomenon by Daniel I. A. Cohen* and Talbot M. Katz in Journal of number theory 18, 261-268 (1984)

The second is a more general statement about first digits. It is

The first digit problem by Ralph Raimi in American Math Monthly vol 83 No 7

Hope this all helps.

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$
2
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ The references Ben gave contain the answer and much more. The main idea here is to show that the log of you values become equidistributed $\pmod{1}$. The Benford behavior then follows by exponentiation. $\endgroup$ – Gjergji Zaimi Dec 17 '09 at 1:55
  • $\begingroup$ Great - thanks. I don't have easy access to these papers but I'll try to dig them up! $\endgroup$ – Alon Amit Dec 17 '09 at 6:52

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.