8
$\begingroup$

Let $Q\in GL_n(\mathbb{C})$. The free unitary quantum group is the universal $C^*$-algebra $A_u(Q)$ with generators $u_{ij},1\leq i,j\leq n$ and relations making $u=(u_{ij})$ as well as $Q\bar{u}Q^{-1}$ unitary, where $\bar{u}=(u_{ij}^*)$. The comultiplication is defined by \begin{align} \Phi(u_{ij})=\sum_k u_{ik}\otimes u_{kj}. \end{align} $(A_u(Q),\Phi)$ is a compact quantum group.

Let $Q\in GL_n(\mathbb{C})$ such that $Q\bar{Q}=\pm 1$. The free orthogonal quantum group is the universal $C^*$-algebra $A_o(Q)$ with generators $u_{ij},1\leq i,j\leq n$ such that $u=Q\bar{u}Q^{-1}$ is unitary. As above $(A_o(Q),\Phi)$ is a compact quantum group.

It is well-known that every compact quantum group admits a unique Haar state. My question is that

  • What is the expliciit expression of the Haar state on $A_u(Q)$ and $A_o(Q)$?
  • Are they faithful?

By the way, it is known for $SU_q(2)$ and $SU_q(2)\cong A_o(Q)$ for $Q=\begin{pmatrix} 0& |q|^{1/2} \newline -\text{sign}(q)|q|^{-1/2}&0 \end{pmatrix}.$

I just find out that the Haar state is tracial if and only if the coinverse $\kappa$ on the dense Hopf $*$-algebra satifies $\kappa^2=id$ (see "compact quantum groups" Thm 1.5 by Woronowicz).

Thanks!

$\endgroup$
6
  • $\begingroup$ Maybe this arxiv.org/abs/0812.1546 paper on explicit Haar states on SU_q(N) is useful? Also, it could be of interest to state what the the answers for your question for SUq(2) are, if they are known. $\endgroup$ Mar 15, 2012 at 14:07
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ If you understand the irreducible corepresentations, then you understand the Haar state, as $h(1)=1$, and $h(a)=0$ for any other matrix coefficient $a$ of an irreducible corep. This is worked out in Timmermann's book (section 6.4) or in Banica's paper ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=1378260 But maybe that's not "explicit" enough for you. $\endgroup$ Mar 15, 2012 at 14:27
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Jan Jitse Venselaar: there is an injective unital $*$-rep on the Hopf $*$-algebra, which allows one to expree the Haar state on $SU_q(2)$ for $q\neq 1$. The Haar state is not tracial by e.g. the fact I mentioned above. It is faithful. see Example 3.1.6 "A Survey of $C^*$-Algebraic Quantum Groups. I" by Johan Kustermans and Lars Tuset $\endgroup$
    – m07kl
    Mar 15, 2012 at 16:54
  • $\begingroup$ @Matthew Daws: Where can I find Banica's paper? $\endgroup$
    – m07kl
    Mar 15, 2012 at 17:00
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @MatthewDaws teobanica.wordpress.com/publications $\endgroup$ Sep 30, 2015 at 16:37

1 Answer 1

7
$\begingroup$

Have you seen arXiv:math/0511253?

INTEGRATION OVER COMPACT QUANTUM GROUPS

TEODOR BANICA AND BENOIT COLLINS

Abstract. We find a combinatorial formula for the Haar functional of the orthogonal and unitary quantum groups. As an application, we consider diagonal coefficients of the fundamental representation, and we investigate their spectral measures.

(I do not have sufficient reputation to post this as a comment.)

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks! This paper gives explicit formula for $A_u(1_n)$ and $A_o(1_n)$. They are both tracial, since $\kappa^2=id$. Do you know any thing about faithfulness? $\endgroup$
    – m07kl
    Mar 15, 2012 at 16:41
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I believe (but I do not at this precise moment have access to the relevant papers, so please check for yourself) that $A_u(1_n)$ and $A_o(1_n)$ are not co-amenable for $n \geq 3$, which would imply that the Haar state is not faithful. $\endgroup$
    – Tom Cooney
    Mar 16, 2012 at 9:04
  • $\begingroup$ thanks! For universal compact quantum groups, Co-amenability is equivalent to faithfulness of the Haar state (see Thm 3.6 "Co-Amenability of Compact Quantum Groups" by E. B´edos G.J. Murphy L. Tuset). $A_o(n)$ is coamenable only for $n = 2$, while $A_u(n)$ is not coamenable for any $n$. $\endgroup$
    – m07kl
    Mar 16, 2012 at 9:41
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ It might be useful to stress that the Haar state is always faithful on the dense Hopf *-algebra spanned by the coefficients of the finite-dimensional corepresentations of a compact quantum groups (which is the *-algebra generated by the $u_{ij}$ in these examples) and - by construction - on the reduced $C^*$-algebra. $\endgroup$
    – Uwe Franz
    Jan 7, 2013 at 12:56

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.