4
$\begingroup$

If $0< a_1\le a_2\le \cdots \le a_n\le a_{n+1}$ and $p>1$, is it true that $$\left(\frac{n+1}{n}\right)^{1-\frac{1}{p}}\left(\frac{\sum_{i=1}^{n+1}a_i^p}{\sum_{i=1}^{n}a_i^p}\right)^{\frac{1}{p}}\ge \frac{\sum_{i=1}^{n+1}a_i}{\sum_{i=1}^{n}a_i}?$$ The numerator and denominator looks like Hölder's inequality.

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Can you tell us why you suspect this? $\endgroup$ – Anthony Quas Mar 10 '12 at 21:55
  • $\begingroup$ If it is true, then I have something to say, but.... $\endgroup$ – Russel Mar 10 '12 at 22:36
10
$\begingroup$

It's not true. Your proposed inequality can be thought of as saying that the quotient

$(L^p\text{-average of }a_1,\ldots,a_n)/(L^1\text{-average of }a_1,\ldots,a_n)$

is nondecreasing in $n$. If this were true for large $p$ then it would be true for $p=\infty$, which would say that

$a_n/(L^1\text{-average of }a_1,\ldots,a_n)$

is nondecreasing in $n$. But this is clearly false. Just take $a_{n+1}=a_n$: the numerator stays the same but the denominator increases.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Clever argument. $\endgroup$ – Russel Mar 10 '12 at 22:36
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ For example, $a_1 = 1$, $a_2 = a_3 = p = 100$ works. $\endgroup$ – Woett Mar 11 '12 at 14:20

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.