3
$\begingroup$

In the study of Boolean functions, the hypercontractive inequality enables one to bound from above the norm of $Tf$ by some norm of $f$, where $T$ is the noise operator depending on the noise parameter. This can be written in terms of the Fourier transform of $f$ as (in a special case of $q=2$):

$\left( \sum\limits_{S \subseteq [n]} (p - 1)^{|S|} \widehat{f}(S)^2 \right)^{1/2} \leq \left( \frac{1}{2^n} \sum\limits_{x \in (0,1)^n} |f(x)|^p \right)^{1/p}$

However, this involves all Fourier levels of $f$. In the application I have in mind, I'm interested only in bounding the norm of the first level of $f$, i.e. restricting the sum on the left to $|S| = 1$. Is it possible to give any inequality of this kind, probably with a different right hand side (but still involving some information about the norm of $f$) and some additional assumptions on $f$? If it's impossible for some trivial reasons, let me know anyway.

Here I'd be mostly interested in matrix-valued Boolean functions (see for example http://arxiv.org/abs/0705.3806), although any answer would be appreciated.

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

5
$\begingroup$

Here is some general discussion of the level-1 weight of Boolean functions --

http://analysisofbooleanfunctions.org/?p=885

-- including the theorems that:

  1. If f is boolean-valued and all of its degree-1 coefficients are small then the weight at level 1 is not more than $2/\pi$;
  2. If f is boolean-valued and has very small variance $\alpha$ then the weight at level 1 is at most $2 \alpha \log_2(1/\alpha)$. ["Chang's Lemma", or "Talagrand's Lemma"]

For functions that are not boolean-valued, I don't have a lot to say; the main thing I can suggest is taking $p$ in the hypercontractive inequality as you stated it very close to $1$; if it is, say, $1+\epsilon$ then the LHS will have $\widehat{f}(\emptyset)^2$ (which usually you have information about), plus $\epsilon$ times the weight at level 1, plus at most $\epsilon^2$ times the $2$-norm (neglectable if $\epsilon$ is small enough). So this may allow you to "isolate" the level-1 weight after subtracting $\widehat{f}(\emptyset)^2$ and dividing by $\epsilon$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.