2
$\begingroup$

Consider a cyclic cover $C$ of $\mathbb{C}P^1$ branched over three points. Let $P, Q\in C$ be branch points. When is $P-Q$ torsion in the Jacobian?

If the cover is totally branched at $P$ and $Q$, then $P-Q$ is torsion, because a multiple of $P-Q$ is the pull back of a degree zero divisor on $\mathbb{C}P^1$. But this is the only result I know about the question.

$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ If the ramification index at $P$ and $Q$ is the same you can factor the cover into one totally branched an one totally unbranched. If the totally unbranched cover is $\mathbb CP^1$, you're done, it seems like $P-Q$ will almost certainly not be torsion. This gives a slight strengthening of your result. $\endgroup$
    – Will Sawin
    Feb 4, 2012 at 23:17
  • $\begingroup$ Will, why do you think that P-Q will almost certainly not be torsion? $\endgroup$
    – Alex
    Feb 5, 2012 at 0:27
  • $\begingroup$ It's a pair of unbranched points. Almost all points are unbranched, and almost all differences of points are nontorsion, so almost all differences of unbranched points are nontorsion. There's a minor issue where the pullback of the divisor is not the same as the divisor, but I don't think this changes whether it's torsion. $\endgroup$
    – Will Sawin
    Feb 5, 2012 at 4:16
  • $\begingroup$ I don't think I understand your comments Will. It is not true that every cover can be factored into a totally branched cover and a totally unbranched one. For example $y^4=x^2(x−1)^7$, where we could take $P$ and $Q$ to both lie above $x=0$ or both lie above $x=1$, so they have the same branching. If $P$ and $Q$ do not lie over the same point on $CP^1$ but still have the same ramification, then the cover is not connected unless it is totally branched. $\endgroup$
    – Alex
    Feb 5, 2012 at 15:00
  • $\begingroup$ I'm suggesting the factorization into $z^2=(x-1)$, followed by $y^2=x(x-1)^3z=(z^2+1)z^7$. Two points over $0$ would then be factored into one point over $z=i$ and one point over $z=-i$. There is only one point over $1$ since it's totally branched there. While the cover must be totally branched somewhere (which is not quite true, take $y^2=x/(x-1)$, $z^3=(x-2)/(x-3)$), it need not be totally branched everywhere. $\endgroup$
    – Will Sawin
    Feb 6, 2012 at 1:36

0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.