I speculated in 2008 that the modified Neretin polynomials presented in A145900 of the Online Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences, which can be summed to give a normalized Schwarzian derivative for a complex function and are related to a representation of the Virasoro algebra, all have integer coefficients. Definitions, references, and links are provided in the entry. Can anyone prove or disprove this conjecture?

4$\begingroup$ Could you please give a selfcontained statement of the conjecture? The OEIS stuff is not really readable. $\endgroup$– darij grinbergCommented Jan 17, 2012 at 2:04

1$\begingroup$ Is it so difficult to make this question selfcontained at least to some extent? $\endgroup$– Vladimir DotsenkoCommented Jan 17, 2012 at 10:21

$\begingroup$ The Question and Remark sections of Darij's answer are rewordings of briefer statements in the OEIS entry and contain no new substantive content. The Question section does conform to the lingo and formality of an algebraist; however, it would only confuse a highschool algebra student. $\endgroup$– Tom CopelandCommented May 6, 2016 at 15:44

$\begingroup$ A note on the Neretin polynomials is given in "An algebra of differential operators and generating functions on the set of univalent functions "by Airault and Ren. $\endgroup$– Tom CopelandCommented Jul 30, 2022 at 23:33
1 Answer
Before I give the answer, let me try to formulate the question in the way I would have asked it here. Fortunately I am not bound by the OEIS requirements of brevity and ASCII, and there is LaTeX here...
Question. Let $A$ be the polynomial ring $\mathbb Z\left[c_1,c_2,c_3,...\right]$ in infinitely many commuting indeterminates $c_1$, $c_2$, $c_3$, .... Let $g$ be the formal power series $x+c_1x^2+c_2x^3+c_3x^4+... \in A\left[\left[x\right]\right]$. By considering $A=\mathbb Z\left[c_1,c_2,c_3,...\right]$ as a subring of $\mathbb Q\left[c_1,c_2,c_3,...\right]$, we can define a power series $S = \dfrac{x^2}{6} \left(\dfrac{g^{\prime\prime\prime}}{g^{\prime}}  \dfrac32 \left(\dfrac{g^{\prime\prime}}{g^{\prime}}\right)^2\right) \in \left(\mathbb Q\left[c_1,c_2,c_3,...\right]\right)\left[\left[x\right]\right]$. To prove that this $S$ actually lies in $A\left[\left[x\right]\right]$.
Remark. If we let $f=g^{\prime}$, then $S$ can also be written as $\dfrac{x^2}{6}\left(D^2\left(\ln f\right)  \dfrac12 \left(D\left( \ln f\right)\right)^2\right)$. We will not need this, however.
Answer to the question. Since the constant term of the power series $g^{\prime} \in A\left[\left[x\right]\right]$ is $1$, the power series $g^{\prime}$ has a multiplicative inverse $\dfrac{1}{g^{\prime}}$ in $A\left[\left[x\right]\right]$.
For every $k\in\mathbb N$, the power series $\dfrac{1}{k!}g^{(k)}$ lies in $A\left[\left[x\right]\right]$ (because for every $n\in\mathbb N$, the coefficient of this power series $\dfrac{1}{k!}g^{(k)}$ before $x^n$ is
$\dfrac{1}{k!}\left(n+k\right)\left(n+k1\right)...\left(n+1\right)c_{n+k} = \dbinom{n+k}{k} c_{n+k} \in A$ (where $c_0$ denotes $1$)
). Applied to $k=2$, this yields $\dfrac{g^{\prime\prime}}{2} \in A\left[\left[x\right]\right]$. On the other hand, applied to $k=3$, it yields $\dfrac{g^{\prime\prime\prime}}{6} \in A\left[\left[x\right]\right]$.
Now,
$S = \dfrac{x^2}{6} \left(\dfrac{g^{\prime\prime\prime}}{g^{\prime}}  \dfrac32 \left(\dfrac{g^{\prime\prime}}{g^{\prime}}\right)^2\right) = x^2 \left(\dfrac{g^{\prime\prime\prime}}{6}\cdot\dfrac{1}{g^{\prime}}  \left(\dfrac{g^{\prime\prime}}{2}\right)^2\cdot\left(\dfrac{1}{g^{\prime}}\right)^2\right)$
is in $A\left[\left[x\right]\right]$ (because each of $x^2$, $\dfrac{g^{\prime\prime\prime}}{6}$, $\dfrac{1}{g^{\prime}}$ and $\dfrac{g^{\prime\prime}}{2}$ is in $A\left[\left[x\right]\right]$).
MetaQuestion. The formula $S = \dfrac{x^2}{6}\left(D^2\left(\ln f\right)  \dfrac12 \left(D\left( \ln f\right)\right)^2\right)$ reminds me of $p_2 = e_1^2  2e_2$ (one of the formulae for power sums in terms of elementary symmetric functions). Does this mean that the $S$ is actually the $2$nd member of a series of differential operators with interesting divisibility properties?

$\begingroup$ Also reminiscent of the MaurerCartan form. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 17, 2012 at 16:20

$\begingroup$ I'm giving up on the metaquestion; but if anyone finds a reasonable generalized conjecture, I'd be happy to hear! $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 17, 2012 at 18:23

$\begingroup$ Ivey and Landsberg in Cartan for Beginners ... on pg. 21 and 22 relate the CartanMaurer form to the Schwarzian. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 17, 2012 at 19:25