4
$\begingroup$

Let $A$ be a Hopf algebra over a field $k$. Let $B$ be a normal subHopf algebra of $A$. Is $A$ coflat over $A//B$? An explanation would be greatly appreciated.

(A novice to Hopf algebras, I am attempting to follow the computation of the homotopy of some Thom spectra in Kochman's book. Given $F$, an $A//B$-free coresolution of $k$, Kochman states that $F \Box_{A//B} A$ is an $A$-free coresolution of $k \Box_{A//B} A \cong B$. I don't see why $-\Box_{A//B} A$ preserves exactness.)

$\endgroup$
3
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ What is $A//B$ ? Some GIT quotient? Also, a definition of "coflat" would be nice. You mean that cotensoring with $A$ is exact? Somehow I am not really sure it is the same "coflat" as in projecteuclid.org/DPubS/Repository/1.0/… ... $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 22, 2011 at 23:46
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I can't speak for OP, but I've seen $A // B$ used to denote $A \otimes_B k$. $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 23, 2011 at 1:07
  • $\begingroup$ Ya the definition Vitaly uses for Coflat is also the one Im an "familiar" with $\endgroup$
    – ABIM
    Commented Feb 23, 2014 at 23:18

1 Answer 1

6
$\begingroup$

I'm going to assume that your Hopf algebras are connected in which case this follows from Theorem 4.10 of Milnor-Moore (On the structure of Hopf-algebras). That result shows that $A\cong B\otimes A//B$ as a left $B$-module and right $A//B$-comodule. I should point out that this result is remarkably useful.

This means $A$ is an extended $A//B$-comodule over a field and hence it is injective in the category of $A//B$-comodules. The fact that extended coalgebras are injective (when working over a field) is an easy exercise, but you can also find the result in the context of Hopf-algebroids as A1.2.2 'in Ravenel's Complex Cobordism and Stable Homotopy.'

Since $A$ is injective the functor $-\square _{A//B} A$ is exact.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for the great answer! I see why extended $A//B$-comodules over a field are injective. This means that the functor Hom$_{A//B}(−,A)$ is exact, but why does this imply that the functor $−\Box_{A//B}A$ is exact? Is there a connection between Hom and the cotensor product as in A1.1.6(b) in Ravenel's book, or is it simpler than this? $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 24, 2011 at 22:44
  • $\begingroup$ At this point I think everything is homological algebra: Fixing either one of the terms, the box product is left exact, at least over a field (or more generally if all of the tensor products used in the definition of the box product involve flat modules). Formally, this is because it is defined as a kernel of a map of modules. Since we have enough injectives we can compute the right derived functors of the box product using an injective resolution of one of the variables. If one of those variables is injective there are no higher derived functors. $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 25, 2011 at 12:09
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Now let's be specific. Let $C\rightarrow D\rightarrow E$ be a short exact sequence of $A//B$-comodules. Apply $-\square_{A//B} A$ to obtain a long exact sequence: [ 0\rightarrow C\square_{A//B} A\rightarrow D\square{A//B} A\rightarrow E\square_{A//B} A \rightarrow Cotor^1_{A//B}(C,A)\rightarrow Cotor^1_{A//B}(D,A)\rightarrow \cdots ] Since $A$ is injective the higher derived functors $Cotor^i_{A//B}(-,A)$ for $i>0$ are all zero. This shows that $-\square_{A//B} A$ is exact if $A$ is an injective $A//B$ comodule. $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 25, 2011 at 12:18
  • $\begingroup$ You could also use the A.1.1.6(b) if you know that all of your graded Hopf algebras are finite dimensional in each fixed degree (this is often the case in topology). This gives you the useful formula [ Ext^i_\Gamma( M^*, N)\cong Cotor^i(M^{**},N)\cong Cotor^i(M,N). ] $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 25, 2011 at 12:25

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.