Divergence of Dirichlet series Suppose $s$ is a complex number with $\Re(s) \in (0,1]$ and $\{a_n\}$ is a complex sequence converging to $a \neq 0$. Must the Dirichlet series $$\sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac{a_n}{n^s}$$ diverge?
I asked this question on math.stackexchange on 2011-12-13.  Here is the link:  https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/91218/divergence-of-dirichlet-series.
For reference, put $s = r + it$.  It is easy to see that the above series must converge if $r > 1$ and must diverge if $r \leq 0$ or if $s = 1$.  On math.stackexchange I was able to prove divergence for $0 < r < 1$, using a result from Knopp.  This leaves the question open for $s = 1 + it$, where $t \neq 0$.
 A: The answer to your question is yes, the series must always diverge when $\Re (s)\in (0,1]$. The proof is a little delicate but here is the argument:
First of all to reiterate what you already mentioned, since the $a_n$'s have a non-zero limit, the abscissa of absolute convergence and the abscissa of convergence are both equal to $1$. Also the series clearly does not converge absolutely for $\Re (s)=1$, and it doesn't converge at all for $s=1$, so the only question is whether or not it converges conditionally for $s=1+it,~t\not= 0$.
Now for $t\not= 0$ let $$S_N=\sum_{n=1}^N\frac{a_n}{n^{1+it}}.$$
By a simple power series argument, for all $K,N\in\mathbb{N}$ with $K\le N/2$ we have that
$$t(\log (N+K)-\log N)<\frac{ctK}{N},$$
for some universal constant $c>0$. Thus for $\epsilon >0$ if $N$ is large enough (depending on $t$) then choosing $$K=\left[\frac{\epsilon N}{ct}\right],$$
gives that $t(\log (N+K)-\log N)<\epsilon$.
Finally assume that $\epsilon$ is small and that $N$ is chosen as large as you need so that the quantities $a_n\exp(-it\log n)$ are all close to some constant $c'$, with $|c'|\approx |a|$, for all $N< n\le N+K.$
Then since the argument of the summand can not change by more than $\epsilon$ over this range we have that
$$|S_{N+K}-S_N|=\left|\sum_{n=N+1}^{N+K}\frac{a_n\exp(-it\log n)}{n}\right|\gg |a|\sum_{n=1}^K\frac{1}{N+n}.$$
Pulling out the $N$ from the denominator gives
$$|S_{N+K}-S_N|\gg \frac{|a|K}{N}\gg 1.$$
The final implied constant depends on $\epsilon$ and $t$, but both of these parameters are fixed (note that we don't have to let $\epsilon$ tend to $0$ to make this work, we just need it to be small). Therefore the sequence $S_N$ is not a Cauchy sequence and the Dirichlet series is not conditionally convergent for any value of $t$.
The underlying reason why the series don't converge is that the phase of the summand is not increasing fast enough to cause the necessary amount of cancellation.
A: I had a devil of a time figuring out the previous answer, but I now believe it to be fundamentally sound.  Based on that answer, I am providing another one with a number of gaps filled in.
First note that we can assume WLOG that $a = 1$.  Under this assumption we will show that either the real or the imaginary part of $\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac {a_n} {n^s}$ diverges, where $s = 1 + it$ and $t \neq 0$.  We also assume WLOG that $t > 0$. (Otherwise, replace $t$ by $-t$ in appropriate places below.)  Put $a_n = u_n + iv_n$, where $u_n \rightarrow 1$ and $v_n \rightarrow 0$. Note that $$\Re(\frac {a_n} {n^s}) = (u_n \cos (t \log (n)) + v_n \sin (t \log (n))) / n$$ and  $$\Im(\frac {a_n} {n^s})= (-u_n \sin (t \log (n)) + v_n \cos (t \log (n))) / n.$$
There must either be infinitely many values of n for which $|\cos (t \log (n))| > 1/2$ or infinitely many values of n for which $|\sin (t \log (n))| > 1/2$ .  We assume the former.  (Otherwise, switch the roles of sin and cos, and work with the imaginary part of the series instead of the real part; the necessary changes are fairly straightforward.)  Likewise, WLOG we assume that there are inf. many values of n for which $\cos (t \log (n)) > 1/2$, as opposed to $< -1/2$.  (Otherwise, replace cos by -cos and $\Re$ by $-\Re$ in appropriate places below.)
Now $\cos(x)$ is uniformly continuous on the real line.  Select $\delta > 0$ such that if $|x - y| < \delta$, then $|\cos(x) - \cos(y)| < 1/4$ . We can also assume that $\delta < t$.
To prove divergence under the above assumptions, we will show that the sequence of partial sums of the real part of our series is not Cauchy.  Let $M$ be a positive integer.
First find $M_1 > M$ such that for all $n > M_1$, $u_n > 1/2$ and $|v_n| < 1/16$. Choose $N$ an integer such that $N > \max(M_1, 2t / \delta)$ and $\cos (t \log (N)) > 1/2$ .  Now $N \delta / 2t > 1$, whence $N \delta / t - N \delta / 2t > 1$.  Thus, we can select $K$ an integer with $1 < N \delta / 2t < K < N \delta / t$ .  Let $n$ be any integer with $n > N$.  From calculus we know that 
$$t(\log (n) - \log (N)) < t(n - N) / N.$$
Observe that if $N < n \leq N + K$ , then 
$$t(\log (n) - \log (N)) <  tK / N < \delta,$$ 
whence 
$$|\cos(t \log (n)) - \cos(t \log (N))| < 1/4.$$ 
Therefore, 
$$ \eqalign{&u_n \cos (t \log (n)) + v_n \sin (t \log (n))\geq u_n \cos (t \log (n)) - |v_n \sin (t \log (n))|\cr&\qquad\gt  \cos (t \log (n)) / 2 - 1/16\cr&\qquad\geq (\cos (t \log (N)) - |\cos (t \log (n)) - \cos (t \log (N))|) / 2 - 1/16\cr&\qquad\gt (1/2 - 1/4) / 2 - 1/16 = 1/16.\cr}$$
It follows that 
$$\eqalign{\sum_{n=N+1}^{N+K} \Re(\frac {a_n} {n^s}) &\gt \sum_{n=N+1}^{N+K} 1 / 16n \gt K / (16(N + K))= 1 / (16(N / K + 1))\cr& \gt 1 / (16(2t / \delta + 1))= \delta / (16(2t + \delta)) \gt \delta / 48t.\cr}$$
Thus, the sequence of partial sums of the real part of our series is not Cauchy.
