As pointed out by Konrad, this follows from the generalisation of van Est's theorem from Group cohomology and Lie algebra cohomology in Lie groups to the continuous case (see Hochschild and Mostow - Cohomology of Lie groups); namely, that
$$
H_c^m(G,M) \cong H^m(\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{k};M)
$$
where $\mathfrak{g}$ is the Lie algebra of $G$ and $\mathfrak{k}$ is the Lie algebra of the maximal compact subgroup of $G$.
For the case in question, $m=1$, $\mathfrak{g} = \mathfrak{so}(n-1,1)$ and $\mathfrak{k}=\mathfrak{so}(n-1)$. I will take $n>2$.
According to Chevalley and Eilenberg - Cohomology theory of Lie groups and Lie algebras, the cohomology $H^m(\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{k};M)$ is computed from ‘horizontal’ ‘equivariant’ cochains in $C^m(\mathfrak{g},M)$, where ‘horizontal’ means that the cochain vanishes whenever any of its entries belongs to $\mathfrak{k}$ and ‘equivariant’ means with respect to the action of $\mathfrak{k}$.
Now for the algebras in question, $\mathfrak{g}$ breaks up as $\mathfrak{k} \oplus V$ under the action of $\mathfrak{k}$, where $V$ is the fundamental vector representation of $\mathfrak{k}$, whereas $M = V \oplus \mathbb{R}$, with $\mathbb{R}$ the trivial one-dimensional representation.
Since
$$
C^0(\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{k};M) = M^{\mathfrak{k}}
$$
it follows that
$$
\dim C^0(\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{k};M) = 1~.
$$
The differential $\delta: C^0 \to C^1$ is injective, since if $T \in M^{\mathfrak{k}}$ ($T$ is ‘timelike’ hence the notation)
$$
\delta T(X) = X \cdot T
$$
which does not vanish identically.
On the other hand,
$$
C^1(\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{k};M) = \text{Hom}(V,M)^{\mathfrak{k}}
$$
is again one-dimensional, hence $C^1 = \delta C^0$ and hence $H^1 =0$.