Hi. I want to know if the following is true:

Let $f:X\rightarrow S$ be a flat morphism of complex spaces without embedded components. Let $F$ be a $O_{X}$-coherent $S$-flat sheaf. Then the following are equivalent:

(1) There is some point $s$ in $S$ s.t $F_{s}$ (the usual schematic or analytic restriction on the fiber) is $S_{1}$.

(2) $F$ is $S_{1}$.

Thank you.


1 Answer 1


This is not true.

(2) $\not\Rightarrow$ (1)

Let $f=\mathrm{id}_X$, then $F_s$ is supported at a point, so no matter what, $F_s$ is not $S_1$. So, you just have to choose an $X$ and and $F$ that's $S_1$.

(1) $\not\Rightarrow$ (2)

Let $S=\mathrm{Spec} k[\varepsilon]/\varepsilon^2$ and $X=S\times T$ for some reduced $T$. Then $\mathscr O_X$ is not $S_1$ but $(\mathscr O_X)_{(\varepsilon)}\simeq \mathscr O_T$ is $S_1$.

In general, you should expect that restrictions to fibers of morphisms are $S_n$ for a smaller $n$ than they are to start with. More precisely the following is true:

Let $f:X\to S$ be a flat morphism such that $S$ is an integral regular $1$-dimensional scheme and let $\mathscr F$ be a coherent sheaf on $X$. Then $\mathscr F$ is $S_n$ if and only if $\mathscr F_s$ is $S_{n-1}$ for every $s\in S$ closed point.

Remark: This is true for more general morphisms, but you can probably figure that out if you need to.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.