5
$\begingroup$

I apologize if this question was already asked somwhere else on this website. Let us consider $f:C \to X$ a stable map. This is a point in the moduli space of stable maps. It seems intuitively to me that any holomorphic global section of $f^*(T_X)$ gives a deformation of the stable map. It is well-known, but not clear to me, why the moduli space of stable maps in a neighbourood of this point looks like a closed subvariety in $H^0(C, f^*T_X)$ cut out by $h^1(C, f^*T_X)$ equations. Where do this equations come from? Is there a concrete way to see them? (e.g. some sections of $f^*(T_X)$ give forbidden deformations, or the same deformation,...).

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ This is a consequence of the deformation theory of morphisms with smooth target: deformations lie in $H^0(f^{\ast}T_X)$ and obstructions lie in $H^1(f^{\ast}T_X)$. This is explicitly covered, for example, in Hartshorne's notes on deformation theory (go to the section on deformations of a morphism). $\endgroup$ Sep 18, 2011 at 14:44
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ -1 for the choice of nickname! (just kidding. But I think with such a nickname you'll be perceived as an administrator or something by the new users..) $\endgroup$
    – Qfwfq
    Sep 18, 2011 at 15:09
  • $\begingroup$ we have a map from deformation space $H^0$ to obstruction space $H^1$ such that its zero locus corresponds to actual deformations. In symplectic geometry, this map is given by Cauchy-Riemann equation. $\endgroup$ Sep 18, 2011 at 15:14

1 Answer 1

5
$\begingroup$

If we are looking at the space of stable maps, we need to allow $C$ to deform as well. Let $C$ be a curve with the set of marked points $P$. There is a following exact sequence: \begin{eqnarray*} 0 &\to& \text{Aut}(C,P) \to H^0(C, f^*(T_X)) \\\ \to \text{Def}(C,P,f) &\to& \text{Def}(C,P) \to H^1(C,f^*T_X)) \\\ \to \text{Ob}(C,P,f) &\to& 0 \end{eqnarray*} Thus the virtual dimension is \begin{eqnarray*} \text{virdim} &=& \dim \text{Def} (C,P,f) - \dim \text{Ob}(C,P,f) \\\ &=& \dim \text{Def}(C,P) - \dim \text{Aut}(C,P) +h^0(f^*T_X) - h^1(f^*T_X) \end{eqnarray*}

As to why we need to substract $h^1$ from the dimension. Let $(O,m)$ be the local ring of the map $f$ at the moduli space. If the space is smooth at $f$ then the dimension would be $h^0$. But this is not often the case. Generally $h^0$ would be the dimension of Zariski tangent space ( $= \dim_k m/m^2$). If $O$ is not regular, one way to measure its irregularity is by using infinitesimal lifting property: given a map $\phi: O \to A$, can we lift it to an infinitesimal extension $A':$ $0\to J \to A' \to A \to 0$. This is the same as extending a deformation of $f$ over $A$ to a higher order. Such a lift is obstructed by an element $\alpha \in H^1(f^*T_X)\otimes J$ (local to global).

Let $O = (R,m_P)/I$ such that $R$ is regular having same Zariski tangent space. Then $\dim O$ is roughly $\dim R - \text{rank}(I) = \dim R - \dim I/m_pI$. Now $I/mP_I$ is the canonical obstruction for $O$ and it can be embedded into $H^1(C,f^*T_X)$, thus the dimension of $O$ is roughly $\dim R - \dim I/m_pI \approx h^0 -h^1$

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Could you explain the definitions of spaces in your deformation long exact sequence? Are there some good reference about this? $\endgroup$
    – ChoMedit
    Aug 3 at 2:26

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.