Global applications of eigenvarieties A Sunday question for specialists of eigenverieties:
In their important paper "the eigencurve", Coleman and Mazur globalized the earlier construction of Coleman's families, constructing a beautiful eponymous rigid analytic space
that parametrizes all systems of Hecke eigenvalues of finite-slope overconvergent modular forms. Since them many generalizations of this construction have been performed (the "eigenvarieties") which each time appear as globalizations of local constructions generalizing Coleman's families. This process of globalization has even been axiomatized by Buzzard ("the eigenvariety machine"). 
Yet, I wonder: 

What are the benefits of working with a global object (which is 
  considerably more difficult to construct and to deal with) rather than just the 
  local objects with which it is constructed (the families of Coleman and their 
  generalizations) ? 

Of course, having a global, canonical, object is much more satisfying on esthetic grounds.
As a mathematician formed after Grothendieck's revolution, this reason alone would be for me 
a sufficient one to consent the effort of constructing global eigenvarieties.
But my question is meant to be understood a little bit more specifically:

What are the applications, or expected applications (to our knowledge of the arithmetic of automorphic forms, Galois representations, L-functions, etc.) of the global existence and geometry of eigenverities that are not already consequences of the existence and geometry 
  of their local pieces?

Of course, there are already an enormous amount, still growing fast, of arithmetic informations obtained from the local pieces of eigenvarieties. But what for the global structure? Let me mention the only one I know: the global existence of the eigencurve (say)
is necessary to be able to attached to any overconvergent finite slope modular form 
a Galois representation. With  Coleman's families alone, we could construct those representations only for these forms having a weight sufficiently close p-adically to a non-negative integer (for example the one with negative weights). Yet  I find this application
not very convincing, as why do we care about overconvergent form with weight far away from integers except for their being the "flesh" of the eigencurve? 
So what other applications do you have in mind? 
(edited for one typo)
 A: This is something I've told people privately for a while, and now have enough ingredients written up (jointly with Liang Xiao) to claim on the web somewhere: the validity of the parity conjecture is constant in $p$-adic analytic families.  (Fine print: the family must be symplectic self-dual, and be equipped with a sort of Panchishkin triangulation, but that's all.)  Now that the triangulation of the entire eigencurve has been constructed, and the conjecture is known in weight two by any number of authors, it follows that the parity conjecture holds for any finite-slope form lying on an irreducible component of the eigencurve that admits a classical weight two point.  Thus, the parity conjecture for all finite-slope forms reduces to the claim that Buzzard's observation noted above in $p=2,N=1$ holds generally (apply Coleman's classicality theorem to the low-slope, weight two points near the boundary), which is a question of the global geometry of the eigencurve.
A: On p. 4 of Kisin's paper "Overconvergent modular forms and the Fontaine-Mazur conjecture", he explains the possibility of proving modularity lifting theorems via "analytic continuation along the eigencurve". This seems to require a global point of view, since it's predicated on understanding (at the very least!) the connected components of the global eigencurve.
Also, Emerton's completed cohomology is a very global object, in the sense you're asking for: applying his locally analytic Jacquet module functor to the locally analytic vectors in $\widehat{H}^1$ gives the whole (reduced) eigencurve for $\mathrm{GL}_2/\mathbf{Q}$, no gluing required! (I hope Professor Emerton will correct any misrepresentations I have made of his work, if he reads this.) 
