Sign up ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

The title says it all: if $f\colon \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}$ is any real function, there exists a dense subset $D$ of $\mathbb{R}$ such that $f|_D$ is continuous.

Or so I'm told, but this leaves me stumped. Apart from the rather trivial fact that one can find a dense $D$ such that the graph of $f|_D$ has no isolated points (by a variant of Cantor-Bendixson), I don't know how to start. Is this a well-known fact?

share|cite|improve this question
Thanks for asking. I feel more grown up now that I know about this theorem. –  Richard Kent Aug 13 '11 at 0:58
@Cole → I don't think that's what you meant (maybe I misunderstood): $f$ itself might be continuous nowhere: Blumberg's theorem only promises continuity of the restriction $f|_D$. And even concerning continuity of $f|_D$, it's not true that one can strengthen the conclusion to $D$ being comeager (=residual): I believe there exists a real function which takes every real value on any $G_\delta$ which is dense in a non-trivial interval (along the lines of Sierpiński, replacing closed sets of positive measure by dense $G_\delta$ on interval). –  Gro-Tsen Aug 17 '11 at 15:20
Gro-Tsen, what I said is not what I thought I said, since I misunderstood the statement of Blumberg's theorem. I'll delete my comment so that it doesn't confuse anyone else. –  Cole Leahy Aug 17 '11 at 16:35

1 Answer 1

up vote 27 down vote accepted

It is a theorem due to Blumberg (New Properties of All Real Functions - Trans. AMS (1922)) and a topological space $X$ such that every real valued function admits a dense set on which it is continuous is sometimes called a Blumberg space.

Moreover, in Bredford & Goffman, Metric Spaces in which Blumberg's Theorem Holds, Proc. AMS (1960) you can find the proof that a metric space is Blumberg iff it's a Baire space.

share|cite|improve this answer
Blumberg's paper is online:… –  Richard Kent Aug 13 '11 at 0:18
Thanks for the reference! For completeness, there's a self-contained and rather nice proof (or at least nicer than Blumberg's original one) of the statement, plus an extensive discussion, in the more general setting, in chapter 8 of Goffman, Nishiura, and Waterman's book Homeomorphisms in Analysis, available online at –  Gro-Tsen Aug 13 '11 at 23:09

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.