1
$\begingroup$

Hello, I have a some questions, but first I must point out some definitions. A left symmetric algebra LSA is given a a vector space $V$ equipped with a bilinear product $\cdot$, which is not necessarily associative but satisfies: $$(x\cdot y)\cdot z-x\cdot(y\cdot z)=(y\cdot x)\cdot z-y\cdot(x\cdot z)$$ to such algebra is associated a Lie algebra structure given by the bracket $$[x,y]=x\cdot y-y\cdot x$$ This algebraic structure of LSA is important in geometry: 1) Affine structures: if a manifold $M$ is equipped with a linear connection $\nabla$ which is flat and torsion-free then the space of its vector fields $\mathcal{X}(M)$ is a LSA for the product $$X\cdot Y=\nabla_XY.$$ 2) Symplectic Lie groups: if $(G,\omega)$ is a Lie group with a left invariant symplectic form so we can bring $G$ an affine connection (linear, flat, torsion-free) which is left invariant $$\omega(\nabla_xy,z)=-\omega(y,[x,z])$$ and its Lie algebra $\mathcal{G}$ is an LSA for the product $x\cdot y=\nabla_xy$. My question is: 1) What are the Lie algebras that admit a structure of LSA? Only solvable ones, why not semi-simple?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ LSA = what Gerstenhaber calls a pre-Lie algebra? $\endgroup$ – darij grinberg Jul 31 '11 at 13:00
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @darij: yes, more precisey a left pre-Lie algebra. Here's the nLab link de rigueur: ncatlab.org/nlab/show/pre-Lie+algebra $\endgroup$ – José Figueroa-O'Farrill Jul 31 '11 at 14:58
  • $\begingroup$ Have you looked into the various papers by Dietrich Burde on the subject? For instance: Simple left-symmetric algebras with solvable Lie algebra. Manuscripta Math. 95 (1998), no. 3, 397–411 (plus later correction in the journal). $\endgroup$ – Jim Humphreys Aug 1 '11 at 22:14
  • $\begingroup$ Many thanks, José and Jim for your comments! You can see the related topic, (mathoverflow.net/users/16578), Which Lie algebra admit symplectic forms, mathoverflow.net/questions/71766 (version: 2011-07-31) $\endgroup$ – amine Aug 3 '11 at 8:23
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ See the paper of J. Helmstetter, Radical d'une algèbre symétrique a gauche, Ann. Inst. Fourier, 29, 4(1979), 17-35. He defines the radical R(A) of an LSA A to be the largest left ideal contained in the kernel of a→trR(a) where R(a) is the right multiplication operator, and gives several equivalent characterizations of this ideal. If A=[A,A] this forces R(A)=A, which forces the underlying Lie algebra to be solvable. That no semisimple Lie algebra admits a compatible LSA structure follows. $\endgroup$ – Dan Fox Mar 5 '13 at 13:26
5
$\begingroup$

As said, semisimple Lie algebras over a field of characteristic zero do not admit an LSA-structure. There are several proofs. Basically it relies on Whitehead's lemma for semisimple Lie algebras, saying that $H^1(\mathbb{g},M)=0$ for all finite-dimensional $\mathbb{g}$-modules $M$.
On the other hand, not all solvable Lie algebras admit a compatible LSA-structure. There are even nilpotent Lie algebras not admitting such structures, see Y. Benoist's paper "A nilvariete non-affine", and this paper here. The proof is difficult and shows that such counterexamples can be constructed by $n$-dimensional Lie algebras not admitting a faithful linear representation of degree $n+1$.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.