7
$\begingroup$

Let $\mathcal{F}$ be a locally free sheaf of rank $d$ on a scheme $X$ together with an epimorphism $\mathcal{O}_X^n \to \mathcal{F}$. Now due to abstract reasons (Plücker embedding, Serre's results on coherent sheaves etc.) there is a canonical exact sequence of the form $(\wedge^d \mathcal{F})^{\otimes k_2})^{r_2} \to (\wedge^d \mathcal{F})^{\otimes k_1})^{r_1} \to \mathcal{F}^* \to 0$. Here $\mathcal{F}^*$ is the dual of $\mathcal{F}$. Canonical means that the left morphism is a matrix which is built up out of exterior powers and tensor products of the given global sections of $\mathcal{F}$, in a way that does not depend on any other choices. But how can we get this sequence explicitly? I already know that there is a canonical exact sequence ${(\wedge^d \mathcal{F})^{\*}}^{\binom{n}{d+1}} \to \mathcal{O}_X^n \to \mathcal{F} \to 0$. The naive idea just to dualize it does not work since the arrows reverse their direction.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I don't understand what $F$ (not $\mathcal F$) is supposed to be in the exact sequence. $\endgroup$ – Torsten Ekedahl Jul 24 '11 at 6:16
  • $\begingroup$ It was a typo; now corrected. $\endgroup$ – Martin Brandenburg Jul 24 '11 at 8:36
8
$\begingroup$

We have that $\mathcal F^\ast$ is, by the pairing induced by the exterior algebra, canonically isomorphic to $\Lambda^{d-1}\mathcal F\bigotimes(\Lambda^d\mathcal F)^{-1}$. Now, in general if $\mathcal H\to\mathcal G\to \mathcal F\to 0$ is exact then the kernel of the surjective map $\Lambda^\ast \mathcal G\to\Lambda^\ast\mathcal F$ is the ideal generated by the image of $\mathcal H\to\mathcal G$. Hence we get an exact sequence $\Lambda^{i-1}\mathcal G\bigotimes \mathcal H \to \Lambda^i \mathcal H\to\Lambda^i\mathcal F\to0$. Applpy, this your second exact sequence and $i=d-1$ gives a presentation of the desired type for $\Lambda^{d-1}\mathcal F$ and then twist it by $(\Lambda^d\mathcal F)^{-1}$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I didn't know that $\mathcal{F}^* \cong \Lambda^{d-1} \mathcal{F} \otimes (\Lambda^d \mathcal{F})^*$, this is very useful. Thanks! $\endgroup$ – Martin Brandenburg Jul 24 '11 at 10:15

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.