0
$\begingroup$

Hi there, I am struggling with a theorem about truncated Dirichlet series. I am trying to prove the following theorem:

Let $(a_n)_n \subset \mathbb{C}$ and $N \in \mathbb{N}$. Then $\sup_{t \in \mathbb{R}} \vert \sum_{n=1}^N a_n n^{-it} \vert = \sup_{\Re s \ge 0} \vert \sum_{n=1}^N a_n n^{-s} \vert$.

I think the trick is to use the maximum modulus principle for holomorphic functions (a holomorphic function, continuous up to the boundary attains its maximum on the boundary). Using this for the domain $-a < \Im s < a, 0 < \Re s < b$ could lead to the answer ($a,b \to \infty$), but how do I show that such a truncated Dirichlet series attains its maximum on the left border?

I would appreciate any hint on the proof or reference to any literature.

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

Observe that $\vert \sum_{n=1}^N a_n n^{-s} \vert$ is bounded in the half-plane $\Re(s)\geq 0$, and it is very small for $\Re(s)$ large. As a result, there is a strip $0\leq\Re(s)\leq b$ such that the supremum here is the same as in the half-plane, but the supremum on the right edge $\Re(s)=b$ is much smaller. Now your statement follows from the Phragmén-Lindelöf theorem applied to this strip.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for your hint. After all I arrived at the Phragmén-Lindelöf principle for sectors. I think this suits my needs a bit better. $\endgroup$
    – scus
    Jul 21, 2011 at 9:09

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.