Large cardinals and constructible universe We know that if $V=L$ holds, then $|\cal{P}(\omega)|=|\cal{P}(\omega)\cap \textrm{L}|=\aleph_1$ whereas, in the presence of a measurable cardinal (in fact, even Ramsey) $|\cal{P}(\omega)\cap \textrm{L}|=\aleph_0$. I remark that the cardinalities are of course computed in (the corresponding) $V$.
The first is just the fact that the constructible universe satisfies CH, while the second has to do with the fact that in the presence of a measurable, $\omega_1^{L}<\omega_1$ i.e. the existence of large cardinals makes the relative $\omega_1^{L}$ "drop" below its "maximum possible" value (which is attained, if you want, in the "extreme case" when $V=L$).
My question is, what can we say, in general, about the beaviour of $\omega_1^{L}$ given axioms of increasing strength above (or equal to, in strength) $V\neq L$? In particular, what happens if we just assume $V\neq L$?
 A: Each of the following implies that (the true) $\omega_1$ is inaccessible in $L$, and hence that there are only countably many constructible reals: 


*

*The proper forcing axiom

*There is a Ramsey cardinal

*$0^\#$ exists

*All projective sets are Lebesgue measurable

*All $\Sigma^1_3$-sets are Lebesgue measurable


(EDIT: These are just some of the well-known examples that came to my mind. This list is neither exhaustive nor canonical.)
The mere existence of a nonconstructible set, or even a nonconstructible real, does not imply that $\omega_1^L$ is countable.   There are many forcing notions in $L$ which do not collapse $\omega_1$:  adding one or many Cohen reals, destroying Souslin trees, etc.  Each such forcing (over L) results in a model where $\omega_1=\omega_1^L$. 
In fact, "Martin's axiom plus continuum is arbitrarily large" is consistent with $\omega_1^L=\omega_1$. (But also with $\omega_1^L<\omega_1$.) 
ADDED: Preserving $\aleph_1$ of the ground model (which may or may not be the constructible universe $L$) is a key component in many independence proofs concerned with the theory of the reals.  The 
"countable chain condition", which is enjoyed by all the forcings I mentioned above, is a property of forcing notions that guarantees preservation of $\aleph_1$; there are several other (weaker) properties which also suffice, most prominently (Baumgartner's) "Axiom A" and  (Shelah's) "properness".
