3
$\begingroup$

I am looking for a reference for (or a proof of) the following fact:

Let $G$ be a profinite group. Let $X^\bullet$ be a complex of discrete $G$-modules. We assume that the cohomology $G$-modules of $X^\bullet$ are nontrivial only for finitely many degrees, and that they are finitely generated over $\mathbb{Z}$. (We do not assume that the $G$-modules $X^i$ are finitely generated over $\mathbb{Z}$.) Then there exists a quasi-isomorphism $M^\bullet \to X^\bullet$, where $M^\bullet$ is a bounded complex of finitely generated (over $\mathbb{Z}$) torsion-free $G$-modules.

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

Proof (due to Joseph Bernstein). Assume that $H^i(X^\bullet)=0$ for $i>n$. We choose a $G$-morphism $A^n\to \ker[X^n\to X^{n+1}]$ such that the induced morphism $A^n\to H^n(X^\bullet)$ is surjective, where $A^n$ is a finitely generated (over $\mathbb{Z}$) torsion-free $G$-module. We regard $A^n$ as a complex (with one $G$-module $A^n$ in degree $n$). We have a morphism of complexes $\varphi\colon A^n\to X^\bullet$. We denote by $X_{(1)}^\bullet$ the cone of $\varphi$. It is easy to see that $H^n(X_{(1)}^\bullet)=0$. Then we apply this procedure to $X_{(1)}^\bullet$ for $n-1$ to obtain $X_{(2)}^\bullet$ with $H^{n-1}(X_{(2)}^\bullet)=0$, and so on.

Assume that $H^i(X^\bullet)=0$ for $i\le n-m$. Then the complex $X_{(m)}^\bullet$ is acyclic. One can check that $X_{(m)}^\bullet$ is the cone of some morphism of complexes $\psi\colon M^\bullet\to X^\bullet$, where $M^\bullet$ is a bounded complex of finitely generated torsion-free $G$-modules. Since the cone $X_{(m)}^\bullet$ of $\psi$ is acyclic, we see that $\psi$ is a quasi-isomorphism.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.