4
$\begingroup$

Let $(\Omega, \mathcal{F}, P)$ be a probability space, on which $\mathcal{F}_t$ is filtration satisfying general conditions. $W_t$ is a standard Brownian motion. By law of iterated logarithm, one has $$ P\Big(\lim_{t\to \infty} \frac{W_t}{t} = 0\Big) = 1 $$ This implies $$ P\Big(\lim_{t\to \infty} \frac{t + W_t}{t} = 1\Big) = 1. \quad (1)$$ We have contradiction in this below. By Girsanov theorem, there exists a probability measure $Q$ equivalent to $P$, such that $t+ W_t$ is a Brownian motion w.r.t. $Q$. By law of iterated logarithm, $$ Q\Big(\lim_{t\to \infty} \frac{t + W_t}{t} = 0\Big) = 1, $$ which implies $$ P\Big(\lim_{t\to \infty} \frac{t + W_t}{t} = 0\Big) = 1, \quad (2)$$ since $P$ is equivalent to $Q$. Why does this argument leads to a contradiction between (1) and (2)?

$\endgroup$
9
$\begingroup$

Girsanov's theorem tells you that on any finite interval $[0,T]$ you can find an equivalent probability that makes $t+B_t$ a Brownian motion. You just gave the proof that it cannot be done on the whole real line.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Or in other word this shows that $P$ and $Q$ are mutually sigular with respect to the $\sigma$-algebra $\mathcal{F}=\Vee_{t}\mathcal{F}_t$. $\endgroup$ – The Bridge Jun 28 '11 at 8:34
3
$\begingroup$

I am afraid that (1) is not correct, since the law of the iterated logarithm states that $$|B_t|\approx \sqrt{2t\log\log(1/t)}$$ as $t\to0$. This yields $$\frac{|B_t|}{t}\to\infty$$ as $t\to0$

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ sorry, I want $t\to \infty$ for all the above limits. Those are typos. $\endgroup$ – kenneth Jun 28 '11 at 8:02

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.