Tomita-Takesaki versus Frobenius: where is the similarity? I've often heard Alain Connes say that the modular flow of Tomita-Takesaki theory should be thought of as a characteristic zero analog of the Frobenius endomorphism.  ... can anyone justify this claim?

Given a von Neumann algebra $M$, its modular flow
  is a canonically defined homomorphism
  $$
\mathbf{\Phi}: i\mathbb R\quad\longrightarrow\quad \text{BIM}^\times(M)
$$
  that, in the presence of a state (or weight), lifts to a homomorphism $i\mathbb R\to Aut(M)$.
  Here, $\text{BIM}^\times(M)$ denotes the 2-group of invertible $M$-$M$-bimodules.
  The bimodule $\mathbf{\Phi}(it)$ is the non-commutative $L^p$-space for the value $\frac 1 p=it$.
  
  Given a ring $R$ of characteristic $p$, its Frobenius is a canonically defined homomorphism
  $$
\mathbf{F}:\mathbb N\quad\longrightarrow\quad End(R)
$$
  such that $\mathbf{F}(1)$ sends $x$ to $x^p$.
  More generally, $\mathbf{F}(n)$ sends $x$ to $x^{p^n}$.

So far, the only analogy I can see is that both $\mathbf{F}$ and $\mathbf{\Phi}$ are canonically defined actions...
 A: A low tech (naive?) piece of intuition comes straight from the definition of the modular operator and what happens if one tries to carry it over to finite fields. 
The nontrivial automorphism $z\mapsto\overline{z}$ in $Gal(\mathbb{C}/\mathbb{R})$ is encoded in a von Neumann algebra via the existence of a *-operation $(zX)^\ast=\overline{z}X^\ast$. When $M$ is faithfully represented in a Hilbert space $H$ with cyclic and separating vector $\Omega$ we construct $SX\Omega:=X^\ast\Omega$, then $\Delta:=|S|^2$, then $\sigma_{t}(X)=\Delta^{it}X\Delta^{-it}$, so the modular group encodes $z\mapsto\overline{z}$ in some sense.
Let $n\in\mathbb{N}$ and note that the Frobenius automorphism of $F_{p^n}$ generates $Gal(F_{p^n}/F_p)$. Take an associative, unital algebra $R$ over $F_{p^n}$ equipped with a bijection $Q:R\to R$, satisfying $Q(zx)=Fr(z)Q(x)$ for all $z\in F_{p^n}$ and $x\in R$. If $R$ is faithfully represented on an $F_{p^n}$ vector space $V$ with cyclic and separating vector $\Omega$ then we obtain a map $S:V\to V$, $S x\Omega=Q(x)\Omega$, which has the property $$S z\xi=Fr(z)S\xi\quad\hbox{for all}\quad z\in F_{p^n},~\xi\in V.$$ Given such a map $T$ we can extract an $F_{p^n}$-linear map $T^n$ (the analogue of $T\rightarrow |T|^{2i}$ for an antilinear operator). Set $\Delta:=S^n$. As $\Omega$ is cyclic and separating and $Q$ is a bijection, $\Delta$ is invertible and we can form the maps $\sigma_{m}(x)=\Delta^{m} x\Delta^{-m}$ for each $m\in\mathbb{Z}$. Then we find that $\sigma_m$ is an $F_{p^n}$ algebra homomorphism and $\sigma_{m_1}\circ\sigma_{m_2}=\sigma_{m_1+m_2}$. If $R$ is a field over $F_{p^n}$ then we have the canoncial map $Q(x)=x^p$ and $\sigma_m(x)=Fr^{nm}(x)$. This extends easily to the case $R=M_n(K)$ for a field $K$. I'm not sure if a `nice' $Q$ exists for a general division algebra.
