12
$\begingroup$

Is the normalization of a Cohen-Macaulay domain necessarily Cohen-Macaulay? I suspect that the answer is no, but I don't have a counterexample. I am most interested in "geometric" situations, so one can place assumptions like excellence on the domain if it's relevant.

$\endgroup$
19
$\begingroup$

No, take a normal non-Cohen-Macaulay $d$-dimensional projective variety $X \subseteq \mathbb{P}^n$ and do a series of generic projections from points not on the variety so that its image is a hypersurface $Y \subseteq \mathbb{P}^{d+1}$.

The generic hypersurface projection $Y$ will be Cohen-Macaulay (its a hypersurface), but the normalization is $X$, which is not Cohen-Macaulay.

$\endgroup$
13
$\begingroup$

This is an algebraic and affine version of what Karl wrote. I could not produce a concrete example, but here is how one can try to do it.

Take a normal non-CM domain $B$ over some field of characteristic $0$ (see this question for some concrete examples). Find a Noether normalization $A \subset B$ (Macaulay 2 can do it for you).

Next, use the primitive element theorem to find $z \in B$ such that $R=A[z]$ has the same quotient field as $B$. Clearly then $\bar R = B$, and $R$ is a hypersurface since $A$ is a polynomial ring. The equation is likely to be messy, though.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.