The "most symmetric" Mukai-Umemura 3-fold with automorphism group $PGL(2,\mathbb{C})$ admits a Kaehler-Einstein metric according to Donaldson's result.

On the contrary, there are some arbitrarily small complex deformations of the above $3$-fold which do not admit Kaehler-Einstein metrics, as shown by Tian. All examples considered by Tian seem to have no symmetries at all. Is it possible to find similarly arbitrarily small complex deformations with $\mathbb{C}^*$-action and which do not admit any Kaehler-Einstein metric ?


[Edited] Such a manifold cannot exist.

Indeed the small deformations of the "symmetric" Mukai-Umemura $3$-fold $X$ are described explicitly by Donaldson in this paper, pages 43-44. There he describes 5 classes of deformations. Classes 1,2,3 correspond to points in $H^1(X,TX)$ whose $PSL(2,C)$ orbits are closed, and the corresponding small deformations admit Kahler-Einstein metrics thanks to a theorem of Székelyhidi, see Propositions 7,8 and page 12 of this paper.

Cases 4,5 have orbits that are not closed, and do not admit Kahler-Einstein metrics thanks to Tian's argument (case 5 contains the manifold considered by Tian). These are the only possible cases where you could hope to find an example. Any such manifold has a nontrivial C* action precisely if the $PSL(2,C)$-stabilizer of the corresponding point in $H^1(X,TX)$ contains a C*. However one can check directly that in both cases the stabilizer cannot contain any C*

  • $\begingroup$ Thanks, this sounds correct. It is also an excellent news for what I am trying to do at the moment. $\endgroup$
    – Yann
    Jun 20 '11 at 9:55
  • $\begingroup$ Actually there cannot be any nontrivial stabilizer in case 5 either. $\endgroup$
    – Yann
    Jul 13 '11 at 12:59

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.