26
$\begingroup$

Can you put a Ricci flat metric on the $n$-sphere, $n>4$?

$\endgroup$
7
  • 14
    $\begingroup$ I am have not been following the subject recently, but I think, the existence of a Ricci flat $n$-sphere is an open problem for $>3$. I think any such metric will necessarily have generic holonomy, and no examples of compact simply-connected Ricci-flat manifolds generic holonomy are known. See references in mathoverflow.net/questions/16818/… and especially Berger's "Panaramic view of Riemannian geometry". $\endgroup$ Jun 18, 2011 at 3:11
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ It seems that such metric does not admit an isometric $S^1$-action. I.e. the metric if exists has almost no symmetry. Therefore it is unlikely that one can construct it. $\endgroup$ Jun 18, 2011 at 16:07
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ @Igor, you right, there is no logic, but no $S^1$-action either :) $\endgroup$ Jun 19, 2011 at 13:25
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ Compact $G_2$ manifolds also have finite symmetry groups, by the same argument as for the other holonomy groups: a vector field preserving the Riemannian metric would have to be dual to a harmonic 1-form. By Bochner, a harmonic 1-form must be parallel, and so the holonomy reduces, by deRham splitting theorem, to a product of holonomy groups, and the manifold is, up to finite covering, a product with a product metric. $\endgroup$
    – Ben McKay
    Jun 20, 2011 at 8:19
  • 15
    $\begingroup$ @Igor: In fact, the holonomy of any metric on the $n$-sphere is $SO(n)$, not just the Ricci-flat ones; i.e., the $n$-sphere does not admit any metric of reduced holonomy. $\endgroup$ Jun 21, 2011 at 19:57

0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.