Given the seemingly broad definition of NP, it is very interesting that one can prove that any member of NP can be reduced in polynomial time to any member of NPC. (I guess this is true by definition of NPC, so let me restate my question.) How does one prove that no NP problem exists for which there is no polynomialtime reduction to at least some subset of NP problems? If such a problem were to exist, then NPC would be the null set.
1

$\begingroup$ I don't understand your modified question. Of course every problem in NP can be reduced some subset of NP problems  it can be "reduced" to itself, and often to lots of other problems polynomiallyequivalent to it. Why does that imply that NPC is empty? $\endgroup$ – Alon Amit Jun 17 '11 at 7:09