Let $(e, h, f)$ be an $\operatorname{SL}_2$-triple in $\mathfrak g$. My understanding is that $e + C_{\mathfrak g}(f)$ is called a Kostant section only in case $e$ is regular; but I don't impose this restriction. (EDIT: It seems that, in general, it's called a Slodowy slice.) Given such a datum, there is a unique decomposition (*) $\mathfrak g = [e, \mathfrak g] + C_{\mathfrak g}(e, f) + C_{\mathfrak g}(f)(< 0)$, where “$< 0$” in the last term refers to the grading coming from the action of $h$.

Now suppose that we are given only a nilpotent element $e \in \mathfrak g$, and an arbitrary element $X \in \mathfrak g$. Can we complete $e$ to an $\operatorname{sl}_2$-triple $(e, h, f)$ so that, in the decomposition $X_1 + X_2 + X_3$ of $X$ according to (*), we have that $X_2$, or at least its semisimple part, commutes with $X_3$? The obvious answer is “No, because, in certain characteristic, you can't complete $e$ to an $\operatorname{sl}_2$-triple at all.”  To avoid such trivialities, assume the characteristic is as large as necessary.

As a very mild hint that the answer is ‘yes’, the weak form of the question works whenever $e$ is distinguished (since then the semisimple part of $X_2$ is central in $\mathfrak g$); and, by explicit calculation, it works when $\mathfrak g = \mathfrak{gl}_3$ and $e$ is the $(1, 2)$-nilpotent, as long as $p > 3$. Because of the first hint, I'd like to make an appeal to Bala–Carter(–Pommerening–Premet …) theory, but I can't figure out how.


1 Answer 1


In some cases the answer to the weaker version of the question (involving the semisimple part of $X_2$) is YES. This will happen if $C_g(e)$ is self-dual which is the case, for instance, when $g=gl_N$, $N=nm$, and $e$ has $n$ Jordan blocks of size $m$. To see this, one can use the fact that all maximal toral subalgebras of $C_g(e)$ are conjugate.

However, in general the answer to the question is NO as the following example shows. Let $g=sp_4$ and $e$ a long root vector in $g$. Then the action of $ad\ h$ on $g$ gives us a $\mathbb{Z}$-grading $g=g(-2)\oplus g(-1)\oplus g(0)\oplus g(1)\oplus g(2)$ with $g(-2)=\mathbb{C}f$, $g(2)=\mathbb{C}e$, $g(0)\cong gl(2)$, $g(-1)$ the standard $2$-dimensional module for $g(0)$, and $g(1)\cong g(-1)^*$ as $g(0)$-modules. We also have that $C_g(f)= g(0)'\oplus g(-1)\oplus g(-2)$ and $C_g(e,f)=g(0)'$. Let {$x,H,y$} be an $sl_2$-triple in $g(0)'$ which spans $g(0)'\cong sl_2$ and let {$v_1,v_{-1}$} and {$w_1,w_{-1}$} be eigenbases for $ad\ H$ of $g(1)$ and $g(-1)$, respectively, so that $[H,v_1]=v_1$, $[H,w_{-1}]=-w_{-1}$, etc.

We choose $X=X_1+X_2+X_3$ such that $X_1=0$, $X_2=H+y$ and $X_3=w_{1}$. Then $X_2$ is semisimple and $[X_2,X_3]=w_1+w_{-1}$. We may adjust $X$ effectively only by applying automorphisms of the form $Ad\ g$ with $g$ in the unipotent radical of the centraliser of $e$ in $Sp_4$. Then $Ad\ g=\exp(a\ ad\ e)\exp(b\ ad\ v_1)\exp(c\ ad\ v_{-1})$ for some $a,b,c\in\mathbb{C}$. Such an adjustment is not going to change $X_3=w_1$, but it will replace $X_2=H+y$ by $H+y+b[v_1,w_1]+c[v_{-1},w_1]=H+y+\lambda x+\mu H$ for some $\lambda,\mu\in\mathbb{C}$. (It will change $X_1$ as well, but this is not important.) Since $[x,w_1]=0$ and $[y,w_1]=w_{-1}$, this is not going to help us to improve $X$ the way we wanted.

  • $\begingroup$ A beautifully comprehensive answer. Thank you! $\endgroup$
    – LSpice
    Sep 24, 2012 at 15:20

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.