4
$\begingroup$

I have encountered such an exponential sum $$\sum_{m\leqslant M}\bigg|\sum_{n\leqslant N}a_ne(\alpha mn)\bigg|^{2k},$$ where $a_n$'s are arbitrarily coefficients bounded by 1.

I don't know how to estimate such an exponential sum, and I don't know whether Vinogradov's method works. I want to know whether there are certain references regarding its upper bound.

PS:

If $\alpha=p/q$ $((p,q)=1)$ is a rational number, I can deduce an estimate such as $$\ll(M+q)(N^{2k}/q+1)q^\varepsilon.$$

$\endgroup$
1
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Using the large sieve, I come up with $(M+q)(N+q) N^{2k-1}/q$ for a bound. The diagonal term alone seems to give $MN^{2k-1}$ which is not consistent with your stated bound in case $M > q > N$. Can you sketch your argument? Also, what ranges of variables are you interested in? $\endgroup$
    – Matt Young
    May 21, 2011 at 4:52

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

To Prof. Young,

The function of "comments" has the limitation on the number of words, so I write my ideas here.

Sorry, there is a serious mistake in my upper bound. In fact my argument yields $N^{2k-1}(N/q+1)(M+q\log q)$ with is just the same with yours up to a log facor. Here is the detail.

$$THE~~SUM=\mathop{\sum\sum}_{n_1,\cdots,n_{2k}\leqslant N}\sum_{m\leqslant M}e\left(\frac{pm((n_1+\cdots+n_k)-(n_{k+1}+\cdots+n_{2k}))}{q}\right) $$

$$\ll\mathop{\sum\sum}_{n_1,\cdots,n_{2k}\leqslant N}\min\left(M,\left\|\frac{p((n_1+\cdots+n_k)-(n_{k+1}+\cdots+n_{2k}))}{q}\right\|^{-1}\right)$$

$$\ll\sum_{a\bmod q}\min\left(M,\left\|\frac{q}{a}\right\|^{-1}\right)\mathop{\sum\sum}_{\substack{n_1,\cdots,n_{2k}\leqslant N\\(n_1+\cdots+n_k)-(n_{k+1}+\cdots+n_{2k})\equiv \overline{p}a(\bmod q)}}1.$$

Since the summations over $n_i$ are bounded by $N^{2k-1}(N/q+1)$ for each $a\bmod q$, we can conclude the estimate $$\ll N^{2k-1}(N/q+1)\sum_{a\bmod q}\min\left(M,\left\|\frac{q}{a}\right\|^{-1}\right)\ll N^{2k-1}(N/q+1)(M+q\log q).$$

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ BTW: I am just interested in the range $M,N\leq q$ or $M,N\leq q^{1/2}$. $\endgroup$
    – arithboy
    May 21, 2011 at 10:44
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Thanks for the clarification. You can also just create a sum of the form $\sum_{m \leq M} |\sum_{l \ll N} c_l e(\alpha l m)|^2$ where $c_l = \sum_{n_1 + \dots + n_k = l} a_{n_1} \dots a_{n_k}$. Then you can use the large sieve to bound the sum using bounds on $\sum_{l \ll N} |c_l|^2$. $\endgroup$
    – Matt Young
    May 22, 2011 at 3:51

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.