Let $M$ be a connected compact manifold without boundary, $\pi:\widetilde{M}\to M$ be the universal covering map. A fundamental domain of $(\pi,\widetilde{M}, M)$ is a compact subset $D\subset \widetilde{M}$ such that
1. the union of $\gamma D$ over all $\gamma\in \pi_1(M)$ covers $\widetilde{M}$,
2. the collection $\gamma D^o$ are mutually disjoint,
3. $\pi(D)=M$ and the restriction $\pi|_{D^o}:D^o\to M$ is diffeomorphic onto its image.

My question is:
Does there always exist some simply connected fundamental domain?
Is every fundamental domain simply connected?

I saw the following statement in several papers about dynamical systems: let $B^d(0,1)$ be the unit ball in $\mathbb{R}^d$ and $M$ be a $d$-dimensional compact connected manifold without boundary. Then $M\simeq B^d(0,1)/\sim$ where $\sim $ represents some gluing along $S^{d-1}=\partial B^d(0,1)$.
I think the statement might be related to above question.


  • $\begingroup$ The definition of fundamental domain may not be accurate. I just listed the properties that came to my mind. $\endgroup$ – Pengfei May 18 '11 at 13:25
  • $\begingroup$ I think Tom answered my question. What he left there is beyond my problem~ <br> Thanks! $\endgroup$ – Pengfei May 26 '11 at 0:00

The first part of 3 follows from 1. The second part of 3 follows from 2.

There is always a contractible (in particular simply connected) fundamental domain: Triangulate $M$. Take the union of all the codimension zero open simplices, together with just enough codimension one open simplices to make it connected. This will be $\pi(D^{o})$. It is an open subset of $M$, dense and contractible (homotopy type of a maximal tree in the dual cell structure). Choose a lifting to $\tilde M$ and let $D$ be its closure.

For an example of a non simply connected fundamental domain in dimension $3$, take $M=S^2\times S^1$, $\tilde M=S^2\times \mathbb R$. One fundamental domain is $S^2\times I$, but you can make another by first cutting $S^2\times I$ into two non simply connected pieces meeting along a closed surface and then letting $D$ be the union of the left piece and a translate of the right piece.

Edit: This wrong, as pointed out in the comments. My error ws in imagining that the inclusion of the lifted open thing into its closure was necessarily a homotopy equivalence. I wonder if this approach can be fixed.

  • 6
    $\begingroup$ Here's a counterexample to your claim. Take the manifold $S^2$. Its fundamental group is trivial, and so its universal cover is just itself. The only way of satisfying the requirement that the union of all $\gamma D$ be $S^2$ is to take the fundamental domain to be the manifold itself... now you may note that $S^2$ is not contractible. $\endgroup$ – André Henriques May 18 '11 at 16:43
  • $\begingroup$ Of course it is too much to hope that the fundamental domain can be contractible, as I now see. But can it be made simply connected? It's interior can, as my argument showed. $\endgroup$ – Tom Goodwillie May 25 '11 at 15:22

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.