6
$\begingroup$

The top Stiefel-Whitney class of an orientable manifold is the Euler characteristic mod 2, since it is the mod 2 reduction of the Euler class. Does this still hold for an unorientable manifold?

$\endgroup$
2
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ The Euler class of (the tangent bundle of) a manifold only makes sense for an oriented manifold. So, does what still hold? $\endgroup$ Commented May 4, 2011 at 3:52
  • 7
    $\begingroup$ @Bill: the question "does the top Stiefel-Whitney class coincide with the Euler characteristic mod 2?" makes sense for any closed manifold. $\endgroup$
    – Tom Church
    Commented May 4, 2011 at 4:54

1 Answer 1

14
$\begingroup$

Every manifold is $Z_2$-orientable, so the Euler class (with $Z_2$-coefficients) is defined and coincides with the top Stiefel-Whitney class.

Back to your question: Yes, the top Stiefel-Whitney class evaluated on the fundamental class of the manifold is equal to the Euler characteristic mod 2 - regardless of the $Z$-orientability of the manifold.

This is Corollary 11.12 in Milnor, Stasheff: Characteristic Classes.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .