6
$\begingroup$

The top Stiefel-Whitney class of an orientable manifold is the Euler characteristic mod 2, since it is the mod 2 reduction of the Euler class. Does this still hold for an unorientable manifold?

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ The Euler class of (the tangent bundle of) a manifold only makes sense for an oriented manifold. So, does what still hold? $\endgroup$ – Bill Kronholm May 4 '11 at 3:52
  • 7
    $\begingroup$ @Bill: the question "does the top Stiefel-Whitney class coincide with the Euler characteristic mod 2?" makes sense for any closed manifold. $\endgroup$ – Tom Church May 4 '11 at 4:54
14
$\begingroup$

Every manifold is $Z_2$-orientable, so the Euler class (with $Z_2$-coefficients) is defined and coincides with the top Stiefel-Whitney class.

Back to your question: Yes, the top Stiefel-Whitney class evaluated on the fundamental class of the manifold is equal to the Euler characteristic mod 2 - regardless of the $Z$-orientability of the manifold.

This is Corollary 11.12 in Milnor, Stasheff: Characteristic Classes.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.