1
$\begingroup$

Principal congruence subgroups of $SL(n, \mathbb{Z})$ gives a discription of automorphisms of $SL(n,\mathbb Z)$. Is it true for n even too?. Hau-Reiner's paper gives generators for the group of automorphisms of $SL(n,\mathbb Z)$ which are induced by the automorphisms of $GL(n,\mathbb Z)$.

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

Yes, I think the statement is also true for $n >2$ even (see Guntram's answer of the question Automorphisms of $SL_n(\mathbb{Z})$).

As a second reference a paper of O'Meara may serve. It can be found here. The following specializes O'Meara's result to the case $SL_n(\mathbb{Z})$:

  1. Note that in our context $\mathbb{o} = \mathbb{Z}, K = \mathbb{Q}, M = \mathbb{Z}^n.$.
  2. Since the only automorphisms of the field $\mathbb{Q}$ is the identity, semi-linear here means linear.
  3. By 1.13, $RL_n(M)$ is the center of $GL_n(\mathbb{Z})$, i.e. $RL_n(M) = \lbrace I_n, -I_n \rbrace \cong \mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}$ and since $SL_n(\mathbb{Z})$ is a perfect group, the only homomorphism $SL_n(\mathbb{Z}) \to RL_n(M)$ is the trivial one. Hence the radical automorphisms $P_{\chi}$ in 5.4 Theorem A are just the identity.
  4. By 5.4 Theorem A it follows that the automorphism of $SL_n(\mathbb{Z})$ are of the form $\Phi_g, \Psi_h$ that are given in matrix form (end of page 87) by $$S \mapsto PSP^{-1}, S \mapsto P^{-1}(S^T)^{-1}P$$ for some $P \in GL_n(\mathbb{Q})$.
  5. By 5.5 Theorem B, $\Phi_g$ is an automorphism of $SL_n(\mathbb{Z})$ iff $P*\mathbb{Z}^n = q\mathbb{Z}^n$ for some $q \in \mathbb{Q}$ (where $*$ is matrix-vector multiplication). It's not hard to see that this implies $P = qQ$ for some $Q \in GL_n(\mathbb{Z})$. Thus $\Phi_g: S \mapsto QSQ^{-1}$.
  6. By 5.6 Theorem C, $\Psi_h$ is an automorphism of $SL_n(\mathbb{Z})$ iff $h(M) = qM^\ast$ for some $q \in \mathbb{Q}$, where $M^*$ is the free $\mathbb{Z}$-module whose base is the dual base of the standard vectors in $\mathbb{Q}^n$ (see page 65). If $P$ is the matrix of $h$ in the standard base of $\mathbb{Q}^n$ and its dual base in $(\mathbb{Q}^n)^\ast$ then, again, it's not hard to see that $P = qQ$ for some $Q \in GL_n(\mathbb{Z})$. Thus $\Psi_h: S \mapsto Q^{-1}(S^T)^{-1}Q$.

In particular each automorphism of $SL_n(\mathbb{Z})$ is induced by an automorphism of $GL_n(\mathbb{Z})$ (what was left open in the Hua-Reiner paper).

$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I think it's safer not to accept the answer too fast. O'Meara's paper is rather technical (and 45 pages long) and I hope there's no mistake in my considerations $\endgroup$
    – Ralph
    Apr 29, 2011 at 10:11
  • $\begingroup$ @Ralph: I couldn't see any mistake in your consideration. :). $\endgroup$
    – Poove
    May 2, 2011 at 8:28

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.