[Edited to include a dense orbit]

Let $X=Spec(A)$ be a normal affine scheme over an algebraically closed field $k$, with an action of a linearly reductive group $G$. Suppose $x\in X$ is a $G$-invariant $k$-point and that $X$ contains a dense open $G$-orbit. Note that this implies that every $G$-orbit contains $x$ in its closure (the good quotient $Spec(A^G)$ is $Spec(k)$). Must $X$ by $G$-equivariantly isomorphic to a cone inside a representation of $G$?

The natural cone in the picture is the tangent cone of $X$ at $x$, $\def\m{\mathfrak m}Spec(gr_\m A)$, where $\m$ is the maximal ideal corresponding to $x$ and $gr_\m A = A/\m\oplus \m/\m^2\oplus \m^2/\m^3\oplus \cdots$. This tangent cone is a closed cone inside the tangent space at $x$, $Spec(Sym^*(\m/\m^2))$, which is a representation of $G$.

Since $G$ is linearly reductive, there is a $G$-equivariant isomorphism of vector spaces $A\cong gr_\m A$. The question is whether this can be made into an isomorphism of rings.

Associated graded doesn't have a universal property, which suggests that it should be hard (or impossible) to construct such an isomorphism, but I can't think of a counterexample.

Remark 1: The normality assumption is necessary. Otherwise consider the action of $\mathbb G_m$ on the cuspidal cubic $Spec(k[x^2,x^3])$ given by $t\cdot x^n=t^nx^n$. The tangent space at the fixed point is 2-dimensional, so if the cuspidal cubic were isomorphic to a cone, it would be a cone it $\mathbb A^2$, but all 1-dimensional cones in $\mathbb A^2$ are unions of lines.

Remark 2: Since $X$ contains a dense orbit, a natural place to look for ideas for a proof or counterexample is in literature on spherical varieties. I haven't been able to understand very much of it yet. If $X$ is an affine normal spherical variety with a $G$-invariant $k$-point, must it be a cone? In my situation, $X$ actually contains a dense open copy of $G$.

Remark 3: I should probably also impose the condition that $X$ is reduced, though I don't see why that should make much of a difference.

  • $\begingroup$ In prime characteristic, your group $G$ (if connected) is just an algebraic torus, which may make it more efficient to treat this case separately (?) $\endgroup$ – Jim Humphreys Mar 31 '11 at 17:29

If you by "cone" mean exactly that $A$ should be isomorpic to $\mathrm{gr}_{\mathfrak m}A$ it seems that the following is counterexample: Let $G=\mathbb G_m$, $A=k[x,y,z]/(x^2+y^3+z^5)$ with $tx=t^{15}x$, $ty=t^{10}y$ and $tz=t^{6}z$ (exponents chosen more or less at random). Then the tangent cone at the origin (the fixed point) has affine algebra $k[x,y,z]/(x^2)$ and hence is not isomorphic to $A$. This is just raising your cusp example one dimension so that it becomes normal.

Addendum: Turning to the modified question let's try for a toric example: $G=\mathbb G_m^2$ so we should look at a monomial subring of $k[x,x^{-1},y,y^{-1}]$ with monoid of monomials saturated (equivalently being the set of integer vectors in a rational cone). Unless I am mistaken $k[xy,x^2y,xy^2,x^3y,xy^3]$ is such a ring (if I have missed some monomial in the saturation it won't matter for my argument). We then have that $x^2y$ and $xy^2$ are elements in $\mathfrak m\setminus\mathfrak m^2$ (this is clear irrespective if I have missed some elements in the saturation) but their product $x^2y\cdot xy^2=(xy)^3\in \mathfrak m^3$ which means that the associated graded is not a domain and hence not isomorphic to $A$. (I think the general condition for being a cone is that the generators of the monoid of monomials should lie on an affine hyperplane which is anyway how I arrived at this example.)

  • $\begingroup$ Very nice. Thank you. You probably meant $t\cdot z=t^6z$ so that the ideal is fixed. I feel bad for switching the question on you, but I hope you don't mind if I edit the question to impose the condition that $Spec(A)$ contain a dense open $G$-orbit. $\endgroup$ – Anton Geraschenko Mar 31 '11 at 8:26
  • $\begingroup$ Wonderful example! The $A_2$, singularity $Spec(k[a,b,c]/(ab=c^3))=Spec(k[xy^2,xy,x^2y])$ seems to work as well, and is slightly less complex. $\endgroup$ – Anton Geraschenko Mar 31 '11 at 19:24
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Right, note that the generators do indeed fail to line up. I got my example by drawing a cone on squared paper, should have widened the cone to get your simpler example... $\endgroup$ – Torsten Ekedahl Apr 1 '11 at 4:30

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.