3
$\begingroup$

What are the units of $\mathbb{Z}/4\mathbb{Z}[x]$? Anything of the form $\pm 1 + 2 x p(x)$ for $p(x) \in \mathbb{Z}_4[x]$ works, and is in fact its own inverse. It's easy to see that any unit must have constant coefficient $\pm 1$ and, if the unit is not constant, it must have highest non-zero coefficient $2$, which lends credence to the above form. I can show that if a unit is its own inverse it must be of this form, but I'm unable to complete the proof. Just in case, I wrote a script to assist me in finding counterexamples to this form and found none. I've also searched and found nothing useful.

If my form is correct, then the nontrivial units of $\mathbb{Z}_4[x]$ are precisely those elements with multiplicative order 2. Just since I'm curious, is it more than a coincidence that 2 is the only zero divisor of this ring? That is, is there a characterization of the units of $\mathbb{Z}_m[x]$ (or even a more general structure) which includes this observation as a special case?

The $\mathbb{Z}_4$ case is problem 3.10 from D.J.H. Garling's A Course in Galois Theory. I've otherwise completed the book and am now going back through to find answers to the questions I wasn't able to finish. Hints are certainly welcome in addition to solutions.

Thanks for any help!

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ See mathoverflow.net/questions/16821/…. Though the question is slightly different, the answer there is a complete answer to this question (essentially the same as Zev's answer below). $\endgroup$ Mar 24 '11 at 17:57
  • $\begingroup$ Awesome, thank you. It seems I should have widened my search to more general structures. $\endgroup$ Mar 25 '11 at 9:56
5
$\begingroup$

Yes, these are the only units. Consider the obvious map ${\bf Z}_4[x] \to {\bf F}_2[x]$; if $f(x)\in ({\bf Z}_4[x])^*$ then $\psi(f(x))\in ({\bf F}_2[x])^*$ and so $\psi(f(x)) = \pm 1$. Thus $f(x) \pm 1 \in \ker(\psi)$ and so $f(x) = \pm 1 + 2g(x)$ for some $g(x)\in {\bf Z}_4[x]$.

More generally this works for polynomial rings over any local ring $L$ in which $rad(L)$ is nilpotent; then the units are of the form $ (\mbox{unit of} \ L) + (\mbox{something in} \ rad(L))g(x)$.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ I noticed a very minor mistake: the $\psi(f(x)) = \pm 1$ should not have the $\pm$. I would ignore it if it weren't a convenient point for me to ask how to edit an answer. (The FAQ doesn't seem to be relevant and I don't see an "edit" button.) $\endgroup$ Mar 25 '11 at 10:53
  • $\begingroup$ I think you may need more 'reputation points' in order to edit answers but I'm not sure. $\endgroup$
    – Seamus
    Mar 28 '11 at 10:03
12
$\begingroup$

Problem 1.2i in Atiyah-Macdonald states that for any ring $A$ and $f=a_0+\cdots+a_nx^n\in A[x]$, $f$ is a unit $\iff$ $a_0$ is a unit in $A$, and the $a_i$ are nilpotent.

Note that $A=\mathbb{Z}/n\mathbb{Z}$ has nontrivial nilpotents $\iff$ $n$ is not squarefree.

In your specific case, $\mathbb{Z}/4\mathbb{Z}$ has 0 and 2 as nilpotents, and 1 and 3 as units, hence the units of $(\mathbb{Z}/4\mathbb{Z})[x]$ are, as you predicted, exactly the polynomials of the form $\pm1+2xp$ for $p\in(\mathbb{Z}/4\mathbb{Z})[x]$.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Ah, thanks for the correction Martin. $\endgroup$ Mar 24 '11 at 10:26
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The statement from Atiyah-Macdonald even holds for every graded ring $A = \bigoplus_{n \ge 0}A_n$ with unit: $a=(a_n)_{n \ge 0} \in A$ is a unit iff $a_0$ is a unit and $a_n$ is nilpotent for $n > 0$. $\endgroup$
    – Ralph
    Mar 24 '11 at 21:42
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you! The result you quoted jogged my memory. It's also problem 7.3.33(a) of Dummit and Foote (3rd Ed.). Part (b) gives the related result that $p(x) \in R[x]$ is nilpotent if and only if each coefficient is nilpotent (which was much easier to show). $\endgroup$ Mar 25 '11 at 10:18

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.