4
$\begingroup$

Let $X$ be an arbitrary scheme. A quasi coherent sheaf $\cal F$ is said to be injective if $Hom_{ O_X}(-, \cal F)$ is exact. We can also regard a quasi coherent sheaf $\cal G$ on $X$ such that for all open subset $U$ of $X$, $\cal G(U)$ is an injective $\cal O_X$-module. So we can ask a question that

1) Is there any relation between these two kind of sheaves?

2) Which conditions on $X$ (or on $\cal F$) are needed to regard the first kind of these sheaves ($\cal F$) equivalent to the second one?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Please fix the TeX formulas. $\endgroup$ – Martin Brandenburg Mar 13 '11 at 12:39
3
$\begingroup$

The condition you want is $X$ a locally noetherian scheme. Then by Hartshorne's "Residues & Dualities," Proposition 7.17, $\cal{F}$ is an injective ${\cal O}_X$-module if and only if for each $x \in X$, the stalks ${\cal F}_x$ are injective ${\cal O}_x$-modules. If the sections are injective ${\cal O}_X(U)$-modules, that should give injectivity on the stalks (abelian groups form a locally noetherian Grothendieck category, so use e.g., Henning Krause's "The Spectrum of a Module Category" Proposition A.11, which says direct limits of injective objects are injective). For the reverse question, I think you need $X$ to be noetherian.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ To be more precise, it is Proposition 7.17 in II §7. $\endgroup$ – Martin Brandenburg Oct 24 '12 at 14:39

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.