0
$\begingroup$

Let $M$ denote a finite von Neumann algebra with trace $\tau$, and $L^{2}(M)$ denote the standard (trivial) M-M correspondence (binormal bimodule). The coarse correspondence is $L^{2}(M) \overline{\otimes} L^{2}(M)$ with commuting left and right actions of $M$ given by $x(\xi \otimes \eta)y=(x \xi) \otimes (\eta y)$ for any $x,y \in M$, where $x \xi$ and $\eta y$ refer, of course, to the standard left and right actions on $L^{2}(M)$.

Intuitively, this bimodule is regarded as "coarse" since there is no "connection" between the two copies of $L^{2}(M)$ making it up. If this is the case, what if we consider $L^{2}(M) \overline{\otimes} L^{2}(M) \overline{\otimes} L^{2}(M)$ with elements of $M$ acting only on the left on the left copy and the right on the right copy of $L^{2}(M)$? There still should be no "connection".

Question: As correspondences, is $L^{2}(M) \overline{\otimes} L^{2}(M) \overline{\otimes} L^{2}(M)$ always isomorphic to the coarse correspondence $L^{2}(M) \overline{\otimes} L^{2}(M)$? If so, what is an isomorphism?

As far as I can see, the former is isomorphic to a direct sum of the latter. The intuition suggests that more may be true. (I imagine an answer to this question can be seen by viewing the bimodules as morphisms of M into amplifications of M, but I haven't worked it out.)

EDIT/ADDENDUM: Since this is already pretty silly, why not make it sillier? Is it possible for $M$ to be nonamenable and yet have $L^{2}(M)$ weakly contained in $L^{2}(M) \overline{\otimes} L^{2}(M) \overline{\otimes} L^{2}(M)$?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ The above is quite a silly question, actually...but that's research. Many thanks to Andreas for taking the time to type an answer!!! $\endgroup$ – Jon Bannon Mar 2 '11 at 18:27
1
$\begingroup$

The commutant of the action of $M \otimes M^{op}$ on $L^2(M) \otimes_2 L^2(M)$ is $M^{op} \bar \otimes M$ with the obvious action, whereas the commutant of the action on $L^2(M) \otimes_2 L^2(M) \otimes_2 L^2(M)$ is $M^{op} \bar \otimes B(L^2(M)) \bar \otimes M$ (again with the obvious action). The first algebra is finite, the second infinite. Hence, these bi-modules cannot be isomorphic.

(I denote the Hilbert space tensor product by $\otimes_2$ and the von Neumann algebra tensor product by $\bar \otimes$.)

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ $L^2(M)\otimes L^2(M)\otimes L^2(M)$ is not isomorphic to the coarse correspondence, but it is an infinite direct sum of coarse correspondences. In that sense it is clear that it does not present a non-trivial relation between the left and right actions. $\endgroup$ – Steven Deprez Mar 8 '11 at 12:29

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.