So let $X$ be a "nice" topological space and assume that $G$ is a finite group which acts freely on $X$.

Q: Is there a simple relationship between the cohomology groups $H^i(G,\mathbf{Z}), H^i(X,\mathbf{Z})$ and $H^i(X/G,\mathbf{Z})$? Does the Leray spectral sequence simplifies in this special case?

  • If $G$ is finite then $H^\ast(G;\mathbb{Z})$ is concentrated in degree zero. The quick fact is that the $G$-invariant cohomology of $X$ is isomorphic to $H^\ast(X/G)$. I'm still unsure what special kind of relationship you're looking for! – Somnath Basu Mar 2 '11 at 4:20
  • Careful, hypotheses are needed here (to show that $H^*(X/G)$ is the $G$ invariants of $H^*(X)$). Example: take the covering space $S^2\to\mathbb{R}P^2$ with integer coefficients. Then $H^2(X)=0$ but $H^2(X/G)\neq0$. – David Sprehn Mar 2 '11 at 4:44
  • 6
    What? $H^*(G)$ need NOT be concentrated in degree zero.... consider periodic cohomology for instance. – Chris Gerig Mar 2 '11 at 4:46
  • 3
    Theorem VII.7.9 of Brown's $\textit{Cohomology of Groups}$: If $X$ is a free $G$-complex then we have the Cartan-Leray spectral sequence $E^2=H^p(G,H^qX)$ which abuts to $H^*(X/G)$. I do not think there are any simplifications from this. – Chris Gerig Mar 2 '11 at 4:52
  • 1
    Chris: the confusion here is that some people are interpreting $H^*(G)$ to be the singular cohomology of $G$, and others the group cohomology. I don't know which one the questioner intended (but group cohomology would make more sense). – David Sprehn Mar 2 '11 at 5:14

There is a precise relation at the level of complexes: $C^\ast(X,\mathbb Z)$ is a $G$-complex and as such it is perfect (that is quasi-isomorphic to a finite complex consisting of projective modules) and furthermore $C^\ast(X/G,\mathbb Z)$ is quasi-isomorphic to the derived functor value $R\Gamma(G,C^\ast(X,\mathbb Z)$. The latter is mostly used through its consequent spectral sequence $H^\ast(G,H^\ast(X,\mathbb Z))\implies H^\ast(X/G,\mathbb Z)$ but (as with all spectral sequences) it contains some ambiguity which (somehow) has to be resolved.

This is mainly going from knowledge of the cohomology of $X$ to that of $X/G$. Going the other direction is more difficult as the $G$-cohomology kills a lot of information (if one works with rational coefficients instead, it just picks out the trivial representations). However, the fact that $C^\ast(X,\mathbb Z)$ is perfect helps out even though it can still be difficult to say something.

As an example of the relevance of perfectness consider the case when $G$ is cyclic (of order $n$, say) acting by fixed point free orientation preserving maps on the $k$-sphere. Then the cohomology of $X$ is the trivial representation in degrees $0$ and $k$. Such a complex is classified (this is essentially the Yoneda Ext-description) by an element $\alpha$ in $H^{k+1}(G,\mathbb Z)$. For $C^\ast(X,\mathbb Z)$ to be perfect we must have that $\alpha$ must have order exactly $n$. This excludes $k$ even as the order then is always $1$ and for $k$ odd $\alpha$ must be a generator of $H^{k+1}(G,\mathbb Z)=\mathbb Z/n$. It is now easy to compute $R\Gamma(G,C^\ast(X,\mathbb Z)$ (and its additive structure is actually independent of $\alpha$) but we have also obtained a (necessarily) non-trivial invariant of the action. When $k=3$ this is a well-known invariant of lens spaces.

The niceness condition you want is on the action, not on the space $X$. Specifically, you want to have that $X\to X/G$ is a principle $G$-bundle, so that we have a Serre spectral sequence for $G\to X\to X/G$. Of course, since you're assuming that $G$ is a finite discrete group, the singular cohomology of $G$ is free, and only in degree 0. In fact, the requirement of being a "principle $G$-bundle" is the same as $X\to X/G$ being a covering space.

The problem: though the spectral sequence looks simple, and collapses immediately at the $E_2$ page, it's not really very useful, since all the interesting data is hidden in the local coefficient system (which is absolutely not trivial unless $G=0$.)

However, we can perhaps get the relationship you want in a much easier way if you're willing to modify the coefficient ring a bit. In particular, the answer is much simpler if you use a ring in which the order of $G$ is a unit. In that case, it's not hard to show directly (using covering space theory) that $H^*(X/G)\to H^*(X)$ is an isomorphism onto the invariants of $G$, i.e. the subring $H^*(X)^G$ of classes which are invariant under the action of $G$. This is an exercise in Milnor's Characteristic Classes, and I believe some form of it appears in Hatcher as well.

  • Also: I have a vague memory that there's another sequence you can use, in case you want the more general case (I haven't checked this!): If memory serves, there is a different fibration, $X\to X/G\to BG$. The latter map is the classifying map of the principle bundle $X\to X/G$. But studying this would give a relationship involving the group cohomology of $G$ (maybe that's what you meant in the question though....) – David Sprehn Mar 2 '11 at 4:39
  • Thats the principal bundle $X\rightarrow X_G\rightarrow BG$ where $X_G$ is the Borel construction – Chris Gerig Mar 2 '11 at 4:52
  • Right, perfect! Of course, in this case (free action) the Borel construction is homotopy-equivalent to the orbit space $X/G$. A small quibble: it's not a principle bundle (the fiber is $X$, not $G$) but merely a fiber bundle with structure group $G$. Of course, it's still a fibration so we get a Serre spectral sequence as desired. – David Sprehn Mar 2 '11 at 5:11
  • 1
    A couple of comments/corrections. First the spectral sequence of $X \to X_{hG} \to BG$ need not collapse for all coefficients, even when the action is free so that the Borel construction on $X$ (which I wrote $X_{hG}$) is just $X/G$. Think of $\mathbb{Z}/2$ acting on $S^1$ by the antipodal map, which induces the identity on cohomology; the quotient is still $S^1$. On the $E_2$ page you have two copies of the cohomology of the group, which is very big, while the target $S^1$ has a cohomology in degrees 0 and 1 only. Plenty of differentials all over the place. (continued) – Pierre Mar 2 '11 at 6:24
  • Second, the last statement, about coefficients for which the order of the group is invertible, follows immediately from the spectral sequence: in this case it has only one column, which is $H^0(G, H^*(X)) = (H^*(X))^G$. – Pierre Mar 2 '11 at 6:36

Your Answer


By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.