4
$\begingroup$

This is a reverse of the question “Is there a finitely complete category with terminal object but NO subobject classifier?” From “An informal introduction to topos theory” by Tom Leinster I learned that there is 3 definitions of a subobject classifier in some category C:

  1. where we directly work with morphisms of C: for every monomorphism there exists a characteristic morphism etc.;
  2. a terminal object in the category of monomorphisms and pullback squares;
  3. the functor Sub is representable.

In order to make sense of (3) we need Sub which is defined via pullbacks in C. (3) requires C to have pullbacks. But (1) and (2) do not, though they imply existence of the terminal object. Is there a category with a subobject classifier and which is not finitely complete? (AFAIK subobject classifier → terminal object → (have pullbacks ↔ have finite limits = is finitely complete).)

$\endgroup$
12
$\begingroup$

Yes: take the full subcategory of $Set$ whose objects are sets of cardinality 2 or less.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.