When people graduate with honors from prestigious universities thinking everything in math is already known and the field consists of memorizing algorithms, then the educational system has failed in one of its major endeavors.

If members of the next freshman class will take just one one-semester math course before becoming the aforementioned graduates, here's what I think I might do (and this posting is indeed a question, as you will see). I would not have a fixed syllabus of topics that the course must cover by the end of the semester. I would assign very simple but serious problems that I would not tell the students how to do. A few simple examples:

  • $3 \times 5 = 5 + 5 + 5$ and $5 \times 3 = 3 + 3 + 3 + 3 + 3$. Why must this operation thus defined be commutative?
  • A water lily has a single leaf floating on the surface of a pond. The leaf doubles in size every day. After 16 days it covers the whole pond. How long will it take two such leaves to cover the whole pond. (Here lots of students say "8 days". I might warn them against that. This is the very hardest problem assigned in an algebra course that I taught, according to most of the students.)
  • Here is a square circumscribing a circle. [Illustration here.] Here is how you use this to see that $\pi<4$. [Explanation here.] Now figure out how to prove that $\pi > 3$ by a similarly simple argument.
  • Multiples of 12 are 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, ...... Multiples of 18 are 18, 36, 54, 72, 90, ..... The smallest one that they have in common is 36. Multiples of 63 are 63, 126, 189, 252, 315, 378,..... Multiples of 77 are 77, 154, 231, 308, 385,.... Could this sequence go on forever without any number appearing in both lists? (Usual answer: Yes. It will. Because 63 and 77 have nothing in common.) Is it the case that no matter which pair of numbers you start with, eventually some number will appear in both lists?

I said simple but serious, the latter meaning they will actually learn something worth learning about mathematics or about how to think about mathematics. Not all need be as elementary as these. With some of the less elementary problems I might sketch a solution or write out a solution in detail and then ask questions about the solution.

I would not fix in advance the date at which problems were to be turned in, but would set deadlines after discussion reveals that serious difficulties are overcome. I might also do some "teasing" concerning various math topics not covered.

HERE'S THE QUESTION: Which published books of problems can participants in this forum recommend for this purpose? Why those ones?

  • 9
    $\begingroup$ What do you mean exactly by a "serious problem"? Also, is this question significantly different than your previous question? mathoverflow.net/questions/28695/… $\endgroup$ Feb 1, 2011 at 1:51
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ @Jeremy: What I mean by "serious" is stated explicitly in my posting. How is my proposed statement of the meaning deficient? This posting OBVIOUSLY (but only if you read the whole thing) differs from that earlier posting in the content that follows after the words "HERE'S THE QUESTION", set in boldface type (Does it fail to appear in bold on your browser?). $\endgroup$ Feb 1, 2011 at 2:13
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Why are so MANY up-votes given to comments that prove that the commenter did not read the question? I've seen this with a number of other questions here. $\endgroup$ Feb 1, 2011 at 3:58
  • 17
    $\begingroup$ I've hit this question with the Wiki-hammer. Please make an effort to communicate in a way that is less likely to appear condescending or sarcastic. $\endgroup$
    – S. Carnahan
    Feb 1, 2011 at 3:59
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ @Michael Also, lest I seem antagonistic, I thought the original question was excellent, which is why I remembered when I read this one. $\endgroup$ Feb 1, 2011 at 5:06

5 Answers 5


One good option is "The Magic of Numbers" by Gross and Harris (not to be confused with a book of the same title by ET Bell), which was written for the eponymous class Gross used to teach at Harvard. The problems include some stuff on, say, Catalan numbers, and some reasonably serious modular arithmetic (e.g. RSA encryption) with a minimum of baggage, which should recommend the book to non-mathematicians.

The Art of Problem Solving series (here) is also quite good. I learned a lot from some of those books when I was in high school--they have lots of exercises, ranging from very easy to problems I, at least, found quite difficult. And there is a lot of discussion of technique, which I think non-mathematicians often find lacking in other textbooks.

And Martin Gardner's entire oeuvre is great, and I think that recommendation probably doesn't require any explanation.

  • $\begingroup$ Thank you. I've requested Gross & Harris via interlibrary loan. $\endgroup$ Feb 4, 2011 at 0:56
  • $\begingroup$ It showed up today. It looks excellent so far. But there's something really weird on pages 114--115. For the proof of the infinitude of primes, it says on page 114 "we will have to argue by contradiction". That is of course nonsense, and then the usual proof by contradiction, which is pointlessly complicated, is given on page 115. Then it says "Another way to phrase this argument would be the following. Suppose we have any finite collection of primes" etc..... It shows that if you multiply them and add 1 and then factor the result, you get primes not in the set you started with. This $\endgroup$ Feb 11, 2011 at 22:55
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ ....other way to phrase this is not a proof by contradiction. Yet it had just said "we have to argue by contradiction". This is a place where the book could be improved by omitting something. The proof by contradiction (which, contrary to the assertions of many universally respected authors, is not in the works of Euclid) should just be omitted. The "other way to phrase this argument", which proves that we do not "have to argue by contradiction" is in fact the one in Euclid's Elements. $\endgroup$ Feb 11, 2011 at 22:57

Your pedagogical approach sounds suspiciously like the one in many Math Circles. The National Association of Math Circles has problem lists on their website. Here's another problem set which looks interesting.

If your intention is to leave these students with the sense that there is fabulous ongoing research in mathematics, I'd recommend the Five Golden Rules: Great 20-Century Mathematics and Why They Matter. It's quite accessible because it focuses on the general ideas.


Published books of problems generally mean to nudge serious, dedicated and perhaps talented mathematics students towards a research-oriented frame of mind. If you really mean a bound problem collection for general education, I expect you will have to write such a book yourself. But I would probably recommend against publishing such a book - on the grounds: don't teach until you see the whites of their eyes. A mathematics problem that will work with one cohort might variously and unpredictably either defeat or insult the intelligence of another. And, as the the response to your other question might indicate, teachers of mathematics will have very diverse views of what constitute a value partial knowledge of mathematics.

That said, if I had an audience of highly intelligent but not especially mathematically oriented students, I might focus their "last look" at mathematics on Lawvere and Schanuel's Conceptual Mathematics (which has many good problems). The authors show themselves as both wise and smart. While the book could save the soul of a stray mathematician, it does not harbor any hidden agenda that means ignoring the needs of the broader audience. And while it might accidentally remediate some high school induces confusions, even the best trained students will find most of what the authors say both very new and very fundamental.

Serge Lang's Math Talks for Undergraduate also attracts me, but where Lawvere and Schanuel help a student think about the larger world in a more mathematical way, Lang wants non-mathematicians to understand more about what mathematicians do.

Research mathematician/teachers generally hold as a sacred shibboleth the dictum that "mathematics in not a spectator sport." In the case of a class of general education students seeing mathematics in the classroom for the last time, and and the risk of blasphemy, I question this, I question whether having these students primarily trying to solve problems for themselves necessarily constitutes the best use of their time. I believe that the mathematics community has neglected developing of literature of what one might call proof-oriented spectator mathematics. But still I might recommend a book: I taught a course recently out of Ross Honsberger's Episodes in 19th and 20th Century Euclidean Geometry where I focused on close readings of complicated but elementary proofs of concrete and yet often spectacularly counter-intuitive facts, all material most mathematics majors will never see on the grounds that it isn't sufficiently modern. But as a toy model of what mathematicians do it worked very well for my students.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ In the realm of what you call proof-oriented spectator mathematics, there is a very beautiful book by Stanley Ogilvy called Excursions in Geometry, that a 15-year-old who knows next to nothing can read and enjoy. (I read it when I was 14 or 15.) Non-mathematically inclined undergraduates intensely hate that book. $\endgroup$ Feb 1, 2011 at 4:05
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @David Feldman: While I agree with the sentiments of almost everything you write, and while I haven't read "Conceptual Mathematics," I notice that on Amazon its subtitle is "A First Introduction to Categories." I think that the language of categories, as much as I value it, is unlikely to do anything other than annoy the average (even quite intelligent) English major--do you disagree? $\endgroup$ Feb 1, 2011 at 4:09
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ @Daniel All I can say is that I'd probably agree with you...if I'd never seen the book. But actually, I think categories do have a lot to say to an English major (think about characters and plots, etc.) for roughly the same reason they have a lot to say to computer scientists interested in the semantics of programming languages. But developing that point would probably better be done over lunch than in a MO comment. :) $\endgroup$ Feb 1, 2011 at 4:39
  • $\begingroup$ Fair enough--I guess I'll read the book! $\endgroup$ Feb 1, 2011 at 4:41
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @ Michael The Ogilvy and the Honsberger are fundamentally different books. Ogilvy emphasizes theories (inversive geometry, projective geometry) from which theorems drop out - in that sense it seems "modern" and pre-professional. Honsberger just develops these wonderful, elegant, but seemingly ad hoc results. Ogilvy:Honsberger:: Chewable vitamins : exotic desserts. $\endgroup$ Feb 1, 2011 at 5:06

"Heard on the Street" by Timothy Falcon Crack is a collection of brainteasers that were supposedly put to interview candidates for Wall Street jobs. The book has many more questions like the ones you asked - most of them can be solved without any heavy mathematical machinery, but they all require a little ingenuity.

Sadly, the book has become famous enough that recent graduates hoping to get banking jobs often memorise all the problems, rendering the whole process useless.

  • $\begingroup$ But most students aren't seeking banking jobs. $\endgroup$ Feb 1, 2011 at 4:05
  • $\begingroup$ @Michael: true, most students aren’t seeking banking jobs, but nevertheless this book contains many problems along the lines of what you asked for; plus the fact that these skills by at least some non-academics may be a helpful motivator for some students. (Even if they don’t feel “This will help me, personally, get a job”, it can at least help them stop feeling “Ugh, after college no-one even cares whether you can do math; it’s so pointless!”) $\endgroup$ Feb 1, 2011 at 4:53
  • $\begingroup$ When I said most students aren't seeking banking jobs, I was responding to your "sadly" comment. In other words, it's not as bad as that comment might suggest. $\endgroup$ Feb 4, 2011 at 1:15

How about The Theory of Remainders by Andrea Rothbart.

I remember back in the day I was struggling with the concept of modular arithmetic and randomly came across the book above. It's really well written in an unorthodox way as a dialogue between two people talking about modular arithmetic. The book introduces basic concepts of abstract algebra and has plenty of "simple, but serious" exercises. If I recall correctly, it did a really good job of motivating the concept of fields. Above anything, it was written with a high school audience in mind, so incoming freshmen should not be deterred by the level of difficulty. I also found the style of the book engaging. I dare say I was bitten by the number theory bug shortly after reading it.

  • $\begingroup$ +1 I believe this book is where I read a discussion concerning which scores are possible outcomes in American football, which is a really fun question. $\endgroup$
    – R Hahn
    Feb 1, 2011 at 10:17

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.