Modular forms of fractional weight Modular forms of integral weight are prominent in number theory.
Furthermore, there are $\theta$-functions and the $\eta$-function, having weight 1/2,
which also have a rich theory. 
But I have never seen a modular form of weight e.g. 1/3. 
I have been wondering about this for a long time. Are there
examples of modular forms of fractional weights other than multiples of 1/2?
And if yes, is there are reason why they are poorly studied?
 A: Modular forms of weight 1/2 are actually quite prominent in geoemtry (I can't speak for number theory).  For instance, the 2nd order theta functions (which encode information about points of order two on abelian varieties, for instance) are of weight 1/2.  They give a natural and important map from a certain cover of the moduli space of abelian varieties (specifically $\mathcal{A}_g^{(2n,4n)}$) into projective space which is injective for $n\geq 2$.  Here are a few reference for 2nd order theta functions:
Kummer varieties and the moduli spaces of abelian varieties - van Geemen and van der Geer
Igusa's book on Theta Functions
Mumford's Tata Lectures on Theta.
Grushevsky's survey of the Schottky Problem (lots of things on the Schottky problem involve 2nd order theta functions)
A: I am no expert here, but I believe modular forms of fractional weight (e.g. of weight 1/3) appear more naturally as forms on metaplectic covers of GL(2) (e.g. on the cubic cover) and over fields containing the relevant roots of unity (e.g. the third roots of unity). Kubota around 1970 initiated the study of these covers, and a few years later Patterson initiated the study of the forms on them. Patterson's two papers here seem to be a good starting point. Later Patterson alone and jointly with Heath-Brown applied the new knowledge to old objects in number theory like Gauss and Kummer sums, see e.g. here and here. Patterson and Kazhdan in 1984 greatly generalized Kubota's work to metaplectic covers of GL(r), see here. 
All in all I believe the general theory is technically quite involved which explains why so few are familiar with it. However, forms of fractional weight are no doubt an organic part of number theory, but they appear more naturally on symmetric spaces of higher rank.
A: Automorphic forms naturally live on the adelic points of a reductive algebraic group (modulo rational points and a compact subgroup giving the level). One may interpret automorphic forms
of fractional weights to be automorphic forms which live on a topological cover of the adelic group as in the classical metaplectic works mentioned earlier. In this vein, the most modern treatment is in the paper of Brylinski-Deligne. The only arithmetically related work seems to be due to Marty Weissman. The Brylinski-Deligne paper works equally well over function fields and it would be interesting to see its connections with Lafforgue's works.
