Does the Borel functor take equivariant fibrations to fibrations? Let $p\colon X\to B$ be a fibration. Let $G$ be a topological group acting continuously on $X$ and $B$, and assume that the map $p$ is $G$-equivariant. 
We can apply the Borel functor $EG\times_G-$ for a contractible, free $G$-space $EG$. This gives a map $1\times_G p\colon EG\times_G X\to EG\times_G B$.

Under what conditions on the group $G$ and the actions is the map $1\times_G p$ guaranteed to be a fibration?

References appreciated!
 A: If $\pi:EG \to BG$ is a numerable $G$-principal bundle and if $p$ is a Hurewicz fibration, then the map $1 \times_G p$ is a Hurewicz fibration.
Proof: Let $U \subset BG$ be open such that $EG \to BG$ is trivial over $U$. Observe that $\pi^{-1}(U) \times_G B \cong U \times B$. Likewise for $X=E$ instead of $B$ and the map $1 \times_G p:\pi^{-1}(U) \times_G X \to \pi^{-1}(U) \times_G B$ is the product of the identity on $U$ with $p:X \to B$. Hence $1 \times_G p: \pi^{-1}(U) \times_G X \to \pi^{-1}(U) \times_G B$ is a Hurewicz fibration. Thus we can find a numerable covering of $EG \times_G B$ such that the restriction of the map $1 \times_G p$ to each of the covering maps is a Hurewicz fibration. 
To finish the proof, use the theorem that local Hurewicz fibrations are Hurewicz fibrations (see May, "A concise course in algebraic topology", p. 49 or tom Dieck "Algebraic topology", Theorem 13.4.1).
If you assume $p$ only to be a Serre fibration, you get that $1  \times_G p$ is a Serre fibration with a similar argument.
A: I believe what you are asking is true whenever $X\to B$, considered as an unequivariant map,
is a Serre fibration. 
 First some definitions: 
Call a map of $G$-spaces $E \to B$ a $G$-Serre fibration if and only if for all subgroups $H\subset G$, the map of fixed points $E^H \to B^H$ is a Serre fibration.  In particular,
$EG \times E \to EG \times B$ is a $G$-Serre fibration if and only if it is a Serre fibration of unequivariant spaces.  It is known this notion of fibration arises from a model structure on $G$-spaces, in which a map $X\to Y$ is a $G$-weak equivalence iff  each map of fixed point sets $X^H \to Y^H$ is a weak homotopy equivalence. A map $X\to Y$ is a $G$-cofibration iff $Y$ is obtained from $X$ by attaching cells of the form $D^n \times (G/H)$ where $H$-varies through subgroups and the attaching maps are $G$-maps, or more generally if the pair $(Y,X)$ is a retract of a relative $G$-cell complex. 
I do not know a reference for the above, but I am confident it's in the literature.
(Added Later: see the comment below for two references.)
 Now the argument: 
Suppose that $A\to U$ is an acyclic cofibration in the Serre model structure on spaces. Without loss in generality, we can assume that $U$ is obtained from $A$ by cell attachments. Suppose we are given a lifting problem:
$A \to X \times_G EG $ 
$\downarrow\qquad \qquad  \downarrow$ 
$U \to B\times_G EG$
 We need to find a map $U \to X\times_G EG$ making the diagram commute. 
Here's how: pull back the above to an equivariant lifting problem
$\tilde A \to X \times EG $ 
$\downarrow\qquad \qquad  \downarrow$ 
$\tilde U \to B\times  EG$
where $\tilde A$ for example is given by the pullback of $A \to BG \leftarrow  EG$
(the map $A\to BG$ is the composite $A\to X\times_G EG \to BG$). It is relatively straightforward to check that the inclusion $\tilde A\to \tilde U$ is an acyclic $G$-cofibration, 
where the cells that are being attached are of the form
$D^n \times G$, i.e., they're free.
It follows from the model category structure on $G$-spaces that there's an equivariant lift $\tilde U \to X\times EG$ making the diagram commute. Now take orbits to get the a lift
$$
U \to X\times_G EG
$$
solving the original lifting problem. 
