MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

$$ \begin{align} \arctan(x) & = \arctan(1) + \arctan\left(\frac{x-1}{2}\right) \\ & {} - \arctan\left(\frac{(x-1)^2}{4} \right) + \arctan\left(\frac{(x-1)^3}{8}\right) - \cdots \end{align} $$

Is this known?

share|cite|improve this question
What is the rule behind the -+ signs? – darij grinberg Dec 27 '10 at 10:35
Michael, is this from Ramanujan's letter to Hardy (i.e., you)? At least the style is borrowed... There is no obvious way to reconstruct a correct formula from yours: it's false when the RHS is understood as $\arctan(1)+\sum_{n=1}^\infty(-1)^{n-1}\arctan((x-1)/2)^n$. – Wadim Zudilin Dec 27 '10 at 11:28
You can reexpand the Taylor series of the arctan function. I am not sure what the pattern is. Up to tenth order, I get $$\arctan(x)=\arctan(1)+\arctan((x-1)/2)-\arctan((x-1)^2/4)+\arctan((x-1)^3/8)$$ $$-\arctan((x-1)^5/32+\arctan((x-1)^6/64)-\arctan((x-1)^7/128$$ $$+\arctan((x-1)^9/256)-\arctan(3(x-1)^{10}/1024).$$ So up to this point, we get the coefficient sequence $$1, -1, 1, 0, -1, 1, -1, 0, 2, -3.$$ – Michael Renardy Dec 27 '10 at 11:51
1 This sequence begins with the absolute values of the sequence of coefficients given above. – Michael Hardy Dec 27 '10 at 19:25
No, the OEIS stuff does not pan out. The modulus of the next coefficient is 3, not 5. – Michael Renardy Dec 27 '10 at 21:21

I have no references for this particular series, but here's some hints to get a closed formula for the coefficients listed above by Michael Renardy.

If we let $u:=\frac {1-x} 2$, an expansion $$\arctan(1-2u)=\arctan(1) + \sum_{k=1}^\infty \frac {c_k} k \arctan(u^k)$$ can be obtained by term-wise integration over on $[0,u]$ of a (somehow more common) expansion into rational fractions $$\frac 2 {1 + (1-2u)^2}= \sum_{k=1}^\infty \, c_k \frac {u^{k-1}} {1+u^{2k} }\, ,$$ (such expansions have a role in number theory, and are related to Dirichlet series). Here the coefficients may be identified expanding formally the geometric series $ (1+ u^{2k} )^{-1}$ and rearranging into a series of powers of $u$, to be compared with the power series of the LHS. One finds an equality with an arithmetic convolution, that inverted gives the $c_k$'s. The exponential growth of the $c_k$ give a positive radius of convergence (I guess $1/\sqrt 2$), that in particular allows the term-wise integration. Note that $\frac 2 {1 + (1-2u)^2}= \mathrm{Im} { \frac 2 {1-2u+i} }$, that simplifies things a bit.

share|cite|improve this answer

I've voted up Pietro Majer's incomplete answer and Michael Renardy's incomplete answer in the "comments" section. Here's my own incomplete answer.

Here's how I got this series: start with the identity $$ \arctan a - \arctan b = \arctan \frac{a-b}{1+ab}. $$ From this we get $$ \arctan x = \arctan 1 + \arctan\frac{x-1}{1+x}. $$ Substituting 1 for $x$ everywhere in the last expression except the power of $x-1$, we get the 1st-degree term. So we need to replace the last term above by the 1st-degree term plus another arctangent by using the basic identity above, and we get $$ \arctan\frac{x-1}{1+x} = \arctan\frac{x-1}{2} + \arctan\frac{-(x-1)^2}{2(1+x) +(x-1)^2}. $$ Then again substitute 1 for $x$ everwhere in the last term except in the power of $(x-1)$ in the numerator, to get the 2nd-degree term, and then write the last term above as the sum of the 2nd-degree term and another arctangent of a yet more complicated rational function. And so on.

Does the sequence of arctangents of rational functions go to 0? In some sense? I don't know, nor do I know the general pattern.

I actually tried this first with $x-2$ instead of $x-1$; then I decided that $x-1$ already has enough initial unclarity.

I don't even know whether in some reasonable sense the process goes on forever.

share|cite|improve this answer
Modern mathematicians seem very much accustomed to power series but not to trigonometric identities. In the 18th century, Euler began with the identity $$ \sin\left(\sum_k \theta_k\right) = \sum_{\text{odd }n \ge 1} (-1)^n \sum_{|A|=n} \prod_{i\in A} \sin\theta_i \prod_{i\not\in A} \cos\theta_i $$ and derived the power series for sine from it by saying $$ \theta = \frac{\theta}{n} + \cdots + \frac{\theta}{n} $$ where $n$ is an infinitely large integer, then applying the identity above, then saying that since $n$ is infinitely large, $\sin(\theta/n) = \theta/n$ and $\cos(\theta/n) = 1$. – Michael Hardy Dec 27 '10 at 19:47
I suppose I should add a qualification. The identity would be $$ \arctan a - \arctan b = \text{one of the values of }\arctan\frac{a-b}{1+ab}. $$ – Michael Hardy Dec 27 '10 at 21:38
Michael: nice identity, but the sums are over $n\ge0$ (odd or even) and $|A|=2n+1$. – Did Dec 28 '10 at 11:12
Typo. Let's try again: $$ \sum_{\text{odd }n \ge 1} (-1)^{(n-1)/2} \cdots\cdots. $$ – Michael Hardy Dec 28 '10 at 17:59
So the full identity is $$ \sin\left( \sum_k \theta_k \right) = \sum_{\text{odd }n\ge 1} (-1)^{(n-1)/2} \sum_{|A|=n} \prod_{i\in A} \sin\theta_i \prod_{i\not\in A} \cos\theta_i. $$ – Michael Hardy Dec 28 '10 at 18:01

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.