Let G be a braided monoidal groupoid: it does no harm to suppose that the monoidal product on G is strictly associative, so I'll do that.

"With inverses" means that for every object $X$ of G, there is an object $Y$ and an isomorphism $X\otimes Y\approx 1$ in G, where $1$ is the unit object.

I'd like to assume, without loss of generality, that inverses exist "on the nose", so that for every object $X$, there is an object $X^{-1}$ such that $X\otimes X^{-1} = 1$. That is, the objects of G form a group.

First question: am I allowed to do this?

Now I can get a 2-category BG by "delooping" G (using the monoidal structure), so that BG has only one object *, and the category of morphisms BG(*,*) is exactly G. This is a 2-groupoid with one object, and it carries some sort of additional structure encoding the braiding.

A connected 2-groupoid is exactly the same thing as a crossed module, which consists of data $(H,F, d: H\to F, \phi: F\to \mathrm{Aut}(H))$, where $H$ and $F$ are groups and $d$ and $\phi$ are homomorphisms. In terms of G, F is the group of objects of G, while H is the set of 1-morphisms in G with unit object as domain.

Second question: what extra structure do I put on the crossed module to encode the braiding?

I want to understand such G which are free on some set S of objects. In the translation to crossed modules, the group F will have to be the free group on S.

Third question: how do you describe the group H in this crossed module? (That's what I mean by "explicit".)

There's an extensive literature on braided monoidal categories, so I bet someone has thought about this.

(Oh, and I can deloop one more time to get a weak 3-groupoid B2G, and this thing will model a homotopy 3-type X. If G is free, X is a wedge of 2-spheres. Because of this, I know things like the image and kernel of $d: H\to F$. But what is $H$ itself?)

  • $\begingroup$ It's easy enough to describe the free G on one generator, so it amounts to the same thing to give an explicit description of a coproduct of braided monoidal groupoids with inverses. $\endgroup$ Nov 11, 2009 at 8:14
  • $\begingroup$ To clarify, you are working in the 1-category (not 2-category) of strict braided monoidal groupoids with strict inverses and (strict?) braided monoidal functors? Otherwise, I don't see why H and F would be uniquely determined. $\endgroup$ Nov 11, 2009 at 18:13
  • $\begingroup$ Yes this is what I mean. $\endgroup$ Nov 12, 2009 at 20:02

1 Answer 1


I think the answer to the first question is yes. Let $C$ be a monoidal category whose monoid of isomorphism classes is a group, so that every object has an inverse. For each object $X$ pick an object $X^{-1}$ and isomorphisms $l_X : X^{-1} \otimes X \to 1$, $r_X : X \otimes X^{-1} \to 1$ such that the composition $(r_X \otimes X)(X \otimes l_X) : X \to X \otimes X^{-1} \otimes X \to X$ is the identity. (This should be no problem; by assumption we can find $X^{-1}$, $l_X$, $r_X$ satisfying all but the last identity, and we can alter $r_X$ to make the last identity hold.) We also need to choose $1^{-1} = 1$, $l_1 = r_1 = \mathrm{id}$.

Now we build a strict monoidal category $D$ whose objects are the free group on the objects of $C$, where the monoidal structure $\cdot$ is strict and given by the multiplication in this group, and where the Hom sets are "pulled back" along the function $f : \mathrm{Ob}\,D \to \mathrm{Ob}\,C$ which sends a reduced word in objects of $C$ and their inverses to the tensor product of those objects and their chosen inverse objects. This induces a fully faithful functor $F : D \to C$ which is obviously also surjective and thus an equivalence. We need to make it a monoidal functor. To do so, note that $F(A \cdot B) = F(A) \otimes F(B)$ unless there is cancellation between the words $A$ and $B$ in the free group. Where there is cancellation, we use the isomorphisms $l_X$ and $r_X$ to build a map $F(A \cdot B) \to F(A) \otimes F(B)$. The monoidal functor conditions are satisfied because of the conditions on $l_X$ and $r_X$. Finally, the monoid of objects of $D$ is by definition a group.

As for the braiding, we should be able to pull it back along $F$ also, so that $F$ is braided monoidal.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.