10
$\begingroup$

Let $K$ be a finite extension of $\mathbb{Q}_p$ and $L$ be a finite Galois extension of $K$. Let $V$ be a $p$-adic representation of $G_L$ Let $D$ be the $(\varphi, \Gamma)$-module associated to $V$ by Fontaine's functor. Is there an easy way to describe the $(\varphi, \Gamma)$-module associated to $\operatorname{Ind}_{G_L}^{G_K} V$ in terms of $D$?

$\endgroup$
0

2 Answers 2

11
$\begingroup$

If $L/K$ is unramified, then the answer is exactly what Matt said. In the general case, you have to take into account the fact that $\Gamma_K$ is larger than $\Gamma_L$ and the construction is given in 2.2 of Ruochuan Liu's "Cohomology and Duality for (phi,Gamma)-modules over the Robba ring", see http://arxiv.org/abs/0711.4346

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks, it is exactly what I wanted to know. So basically, on the $(\varphi, \Gamma)$-module side, the construction is the "obvious" one. $\endgroup$
    – A M
    Dec 20, 2010 at 18:12
6
$\begingroup$

I've always wondered this too. I think that if $L$ over $K$ is unramified, then we just take the $(\varphi,\Gamma)$-module for $V$, which is a $(\varphi,\Gamma)$-module over $\mathcal E_L$, and regard it as a $(\varphi,\Gamma)$-module over $\mathcal E_K$ (which is a subfield of $\mathcal E_L$). (Probably you already knew this, assuming it is correct.)

In the ramified case, I'm not sure; hopefully Laurent Berger will see this and answer!

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ You have (or had in 2010) the gift of prophecy. $\endgroup$
    – LSpice
    Jul 6, 2022 at 15:41

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.