MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Is it correct saying that the Zero, Successor and Projection functions can be seen as combinators?

share|cite|improve this question
This question would probably have been more appropriate at, since while it’s a good question, it’s not really reasearch-level. – Peter LeFanu Lumsdaine Dec 2 '10 at 16:41
sorry, I didn't know about; I found out about it a minute ago – NoWhereMan Dec 2 '10 at 20:54
up vote 2 down vote accepted

Yes, if I'm right in assuming you mean to ask whether these can be construed without free variables in the lambda calculus. (If my assumption is wrong, I apologize; your question is rather terse.) You can see here, for instance, how the "Church numerals" (Zero among them, of course) can be introduced, along with Successor and various other primitive recursive functions.

share|cite|improve this answer
Your assumption is right. My question was terse because I'm very new to the subject, and it's still quite a lot confused in my head; I'm trying to understand by the help of something I think I'm more confident with (computability theory). Thank you! – NoWhereMan Dec 2 '10 at 21:07

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.