I was reading the proof of Lemma 10.12 in this paper. In the second sentence, the following fact is used implicitly:
Let $(R,\mathfrak{m})$ be a commutative local ring. Let $\widehat{R}$ be its $\mathfrak{m}$-adic completion, which is a local ring whose maximal ideal we denote by $\widehat{\mathfrak{m}}$. If $\widehat{\mathfrak{m}}$ is finitely generated, then $\widehat{R}$ is noetherian.
The first idea one could have is that in a local ring, it suffices to check that the maximal ideal is finitely generated to see that the ring is noetherian. However, this is not true, as the following example due to Clark shows. One could try to prove this under the stronger assumption that the local ring is complete with respect to its maximal ideal. However, we also don't know if $\widehat{R}$ is $\widehat{\mathfrak{m}}$-adically complete, for $\mathfrak{m}$ may not be finitely generated.
Does anyone know a proof for the claim in the box (in case it is true)?
Thank you for reading, any help will be highly appreciated :)
Remark. As Keerthi Madapusi recalls and follows from part of the proof of the Lemma, the vector space $\mathfrak{m}/\mathfrak{m}^2$ is finite-dimensional if and only if $\widehat{\mathfrak{m}}$ is finitely generated.