0
$\begingroup$

I'm working on a problem involving the pointwise almost everywhere convergence of multilinear ergodic averages with the von Mangoldt function inspired by this paper. Specifically, I'm looking at averages of the form:

$$ A_N(x) = \mathbb{E}_{n \in [1,N]} \Lambda(n) f_1(T^{P_1(n)}x) f_2(T^{P_2(n)}x) \ldots f_k(T^{P_k(n)}x) $$

where $\Lambda(n)$ is the von Mangoldt function, $T$ is a measure-preserving transformation, and $P_i(n)$ are polynomials.

After considering various approaches, I've developed a hybrid method to approximate $\Lambda(n)$. At a high level, this what I've tried:

  1. Truncate $\Lambda_M(n)$ $$ \Lambda_M(n) = \begin{cases} \Lambda(n) & \text{if } n \leq M, \\ 0 & \text{otherwise}. \end{cases} $$ where $M = N^\theta$ for some $0 < \theta < 1$.

  2. Decompose $\Lambda_M(n)$ into structured and pseudorandom parts $$ \Lambda_M(n) = \Lambda_{\text{str}}(n) + \Lambda_{\text{rand}}(n) $$

  3. For the structured part, I've tried $$ \Lambda_{\text{str}}(n) = \sum_{p \leq M^{1/2}} \log p \cdot \mathbf{1}_{p | n} $$

  4. Ensure that the pseudorandom part satisfies $$ \|\Lambda_{\text{rand}}\|_{U^{d+1}[N]} \leq \epsilon(N) $$ where $U^{d+1}[N]$ is the Gowers uniformity norm.

  5. To further refine this, I've considered a Fourier-based approach for $\Lambda_{\text{str}}(n)$: $$ \Lambda_{\text{str}}(n) = \sum_{|\xi| \leq K} \hat{\Lambda}(\xi) e^{2\pi i \xi n / N} $$ where $K$ is chosen such that $\sum_{|\xi| > K} |\hat{\Lambda}(\xi)|^2 \leq \epsilon(N)$.

  6. I'm trying to control the overall approximation error by ensuring $$ \|\Lambda - \Lambda_M\|_{U^{d+1}[N]} \leq \delta(N) $$ where $\delta(N) \to 0$ as $N \to \infty$.

Is this a valid approximation method for $\Lambda(n)$ in the context of multilinear ergodic averages? Are there any potential issues or improvements I should consider? Any insights or suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Thank you!

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ What counts as success here? Put another way, what kind of approximation of the von Mangoldt function (with respect to this Gowers norm) would give you the desired results concerning the function $A_N(x)$? $\endgroup$
    – Yemon Choi
    Commented Sep 22 at 17:16

1 Answer 1

0
$\begingroup$

I accidentally logged out of my account and can't comment. To answer Yemon Choi's comment: An effective approximation splits $\Lambda(n)$ into a structured part that preserves essential arithmetic correlations and a pseudorandom part whose Gowers $U^{d+1}[N]$ norm becomes negligible as $N$ grows. Specifically, decomposing $$\Lambda(n) = \Lambda_{\text{str}}(n) + \Lambda_{\text{rand}}(n)$$ where $\Lambda_{\text{rand}}$ has small $U^{d+1}[N]$ norm ensures that the multilinear averages $A_N(x)$ are governed by the structured component, which ensures almost everywhere convergence.

The Cramér approximant mentioned in the paper has good control in the $U^3[N]$ norm (for the bilinear case with quadratic polynomials). However, for the multilinear case with polynomials of degree $d$, we need control in the $U^{d+1}[N]$ norm. It's not clear whether the Cramér approximant would have sufficiently rapid decay in these higher-order Gowers norms which is what my proposed approximation intends to do.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you. BTW, if you register one of your accounts then you should be able to get the moderators to merge both of them. $\endgroup$
    – Yemon Choi
    Commented Sep 22 at 17:51
  • $\begingroup$ @YemonChoi: I have registered this account. $\endgroup$
    – user539113
    Commented Sep 22 at 19:43

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .