It is well known that the large cardinals are ordered by logical consistency. In many cases, the logical consistency is, in fact, a direct implication - for example, Mahlo $\Rightarrow$ Inaccessible because a Mahlo cardinal is itself inaccessible and a stationary limit of inaccessibles.
My questions are regarding how exactly Cons(ZFC+Rank-into-rank) implies Cons(ZFC+Supercompact). In particular:
Q1: Is every rank-into-rank cardinal supercompact (and maybe a limit of supercompacts) ?
If not, then two more questions:
Q2: Let $j:V_\lambda \rightarrow V_\lambda$ be a rank-into-rank embedding. I am guessing that consistency of supercompacts is proved by some cardinal being "supercompact in $V_\lambda$". How is this cardinal identified ?
Q3: Would any of the known large cardinal axioms $\it{imply}$ the existence of both, a rank-into-rank embedding and a supercompact cardinal ?