Let $\{ S_n \}_{n=0}^\infty$ be a collection of tempered distributions where $S_0:=1$ and $S_n$ is a tempered distribution on $\mathbb{R}^n$.
Just below formula [5] in p.122 of the Fröhlich paper, factorial growth bounds and Nelson-Symanzik positivity imply existence of a probability measure $d\mu$ on $\mathcal{S}'(\mathbb{R})$ having $\{S_n\}$ as moments: \begin{equation} S_n(\otimes_{i=1}^n f_i)=\int_{\mathcal{S}'} \prod_{i=1}^n \omega(f_i) d\mu(\omega) \end{equation}
A similar (or more general) result is presented in p.207-208 Theorem 3.7 of the Borchers-Yngvason paper.
Now in p.199 of the same paper, you can find the following sentence in the paragraph just above 2.1 Definition:
Moreover, a measure will not be uniquely determined by the functional it defines on $S(\mathscr{S})$.
Here, a functional on $S(\mathscr{S})$ corresponds to a collection of (Bosonic) Schwingers $\{S_n \}_{n=0}^\infty$ as mentioned above.
Therefore, my understanding is that uniqueness of the moment problem is generally NOT guaranteed.
In fact, 2.1 Definition in p.199 of the Borchers-Yngvason paper introduces a larger space $\mathscr{F}$ than $S(\mathscr{S})$. With a linear functional on $\mathscr{F}$, uniqueness of a measure is guaranteed as shown in p.200 Theorem 2.3 or p.201 Theorem 2.7.
In p.159 of Fröhlich paper, he somehow mentions both uniqueness and ergodicity, but I admit that I can't fully understand what he actually says there.
Meanwhile, I believe that relation between ergodicity and spectral gap is a well-understood topic, as presented in this MO post.
Therefore, I am led into these very rough and tentative questions:
Does ergodicity somehow ensures uniqueness of $\mu$ on $\mathcal{S}'$ as a solution of the moment problem for a give collection $\{ S_n \}_{n=0}^\infty$?
In this case, how does ergodicity relate to the notion of spectral gap?
Several ideas are mixed up here, and I admit that they are by no means organized...I deeply appreciate any insight.